[外電] The latest move in Bulls-Heat chess ma

看板ChicagoBulls (芝加哥公牛)作者sinrong (─═╤╧︻▄& ㄧζ~ㄑ﹫)時間13年前 (2012/02/02 19:36)推噓5(5推 0噓 0→)

留言5則, 5人參與討論串1/1

連接 http://0rz.tw/il9Ng When the Bulls use zone against the Heat. Despite missing a key cog last night, Chicago put up quite the fight against Miami. Barring injury, these are the two teams many expect to battle it out in the Eastern Conference Finals once again. With the two teams meeting three more before the playoffs, every regular season tilt, even minus a player like Deng, still helps each team experiment with new ways to slow down an opponent they are becoming more and more familiar with. 雖然缺少了Deng，但是在和熱火的比拼中公牛還是卯足全力。一般預期除非受傷，不然這兩支球隊將會在今年東區冠軍賽的再次碰頭。季後賽之前兩隊還會在碰面三次，一如過往賽季而接下來每場比賽都會讓兩支變得越來越熟悉彼此的球隊了解更多阻止對手的手段，即使缺少了Deng這樣的球員。 In yesterday's match up, the latest twist in strategy came with Tom Thibodeau deployed a zone for a handful of possession starting in the middle of the first quarter. While this move was most likely meant to help Derrick Rose avoid picking up a debilitating third foul, it could be tool the Bulls use again come playoff time. The question of whether or not they use it is something that remains to be seen, but both teams now have the tape to assess whether not it will be effective and to what degree. 昨天的比賽中，Thibodeau祭出新招露了一手(誤)在第一節中段的時候對熱火少數次進攻使用了區域聯防。這一步棋看起來似乎是為了避免讓Rose吃下第三犯造成戰力減弱，但也可能是公牛季後賽對付熱火的武器。對於公牛是否會繼續使用(區域聯防)的問題還有待觀察 v，但現在兩支球隊都有本場比賽的影片用於分析這一步棋的效果和可能達到的程度。 Before diving into the film, it's important to review what exactly a zone does to opponent's game preparation. Depending on its effectiveness, a scheme change like a zone can take anywhere from 10 to 40 minutes of a given practice, walk-through and/or film session to countering it. That doesn't seem like much. But remember, in a lockout-afflicted season teams (like the Heat) have precious little practice time to perfect their own schemes, let alone react to another team's. 在進入影片前，讓我們做些關於區域聯防的功課。根據其有效性，相較於場上練習，戰術推演以及/或影片分析這些項目，區域聯防這樣一個計劃的改變需要花上10至40分鐘的時間。看起來不多。但別忘了，對縮水賽季的球隊(如熱火)來説能夠將球隊系統運作至完美的時間都已經很少了，更別説是要做出因應其他球隊的策略。 If a team consistently struggles against a certain scheme then that 10-40 minutes can blow up to over 3-5 hours of practice/film/walk-throughs over the duration of a playoff series (assuming that coach wants his team to be prepared ). That is time a team could spend refining their own concepts, adding new wrinkles or simply use to let their players rest their worn-down bodies. With that logic, it seems like the perfect idea for the Bulls to trot out even a marginally effective zone against the Heat, right? 如果一支球隊在季後賽持續陷入同一個項目如場上練習/戰術推演/影片分析而這將有可能使得練習時間從10~40分鐘飆到3~5個鐘頭(假設教練要求他的球隊做這些準備)。這些時間球隊可以用於提煉觀念，增加新的技巧或更簡單的，讓疲憊不堪的球員休息。根據這一邏輯，對熱火隔靴搔癢似的區域聯防看起來提供了公牛一不錯的辦法，是吧? When looking at the numbers, it would appear to be a no-brainer. By unofficial count, the Bulls limited Miami to 5 points over 6 possessions (0.83 PPP). Obviously, six possessions is a ridiculously small sample size. That is where the film comes into play and when looking at that, the answer becomes much less clear. (PPP: points per possesions) 看一下數據吧，比較不用腦。根據非官方統計，公牛限制熱火在五次球權中僅得到6分 (0.833每一球權的得分)。當然用膝蓋想也知道這是鬼扯小樣本。這就是影片的重要性啦，也許答案在影片中會更加清楚。 The first time we see the zone is off a sideline out-of-bounds with 3:03 left in the first quarter. LeBron James enters the ball into Mario Chalmers who quickly swings the ball to Shane Battier on the left wing. Battier reverses the ball back to Chalmers then (perhaps unintentionally) cuts along the baseline with Udonis Haslem back to the strongside of the floor. 第一次出現區域聯防是在第一節剩下3分3秒的邊線球出界之後。LBJ發球傳入場內給 Chalmers，Chalmers快速傳給左翼的Battier。Battier回傳給Chalmers然後(也許是無意) 空手切往底線同時Haslem也往強邊移動。 As James' catches on the right wing, Ronnie Brewer drops to defend both cutters , giving up a gap in the zone. LeBron, employing a basic tenant of attacking zones, punches that gap with his dribble, flattening out the defense and forcing two defenders to the ball. On the collapse, James executes a brilliant hook pass to Chalmers spotting up on the weakside wing. The result is a semi-contested 3-pointer (Chalmers could have easily used a shot-fake, one-dribble pull up attack for a cleaner look, however). 而當LBJ在右側接到Chalmers的傳球時候，Brewer退後往禁區放棄對LBJ和Chalmers的防守，使得聯防出現缺口。LBJ看到缺口，運球往內切，迫使Rose和RIP過來協防。在這關口， LBJ傳出了一記聰明的球給弱側外線埋伏的Chalmers。結果出手的是一個有討論空間的三分球(其實Chalmers應該可以做個假動作，然後運球一步後急停跳投，得到一次更好的出手) 。 (這一段不是很確定, anyway看影片比較快XD ) Here is the video: http://0rz.tw/cImPf On the surface, it looks as if the Bulls forced a tough shot, but in all reality Chalmers just didn't exploit a long closeout by Hamilton efficiently enough. The next clip is a bit of a mirage as well. 表面上好像是公牛迫使了一次困難的出手，但實際上只是Chalmers沒辦法在RIP飛撲下完成一次三分。下一個影片則同樣有點兒海市蜃樓。 (最後一句看無???) Norris Cole ends up setting a screen inside the top on ball defender (Rose). James uses the ball screen to pull Hamilton high toward him. Seeing Haslem flashing middle, James threads a pass through the gap. However, Haslem doesn't hold his position long enough and looks to change space, leaving James' pass to find only Joakim Noah. Cole在高位做個擋拆配合擋在Rose的內側。LBJ利用擋拆將RIP帶到高位。看到Haslem移動到禁區要球，LBJ看到空檔將球傳了出去。可惜，Haslem待得不夠久同時又轉身尋找其它位置，使得LBJ的傳球就這樣傳到了Noah的手上。 http://0rz.tw/enbSH (影片) Even though this lead to a run out and layup for Chicago, Miami was in a great position had Haslem just used a bit more patience. In the following picture, you'll see that if Haslem catches the ball in that spot, the Bulls defense is extremely vulnerable. Not only does he have the space to immediately shoot a foul line jumper, but Haslem can look to go high-low with Eddy Curry (if Noah rotates up) or find Shane Battier (if Boozer rotates) hunting space either behind the defense or cutting up to the opposite wing. 雖然這一球最後是公牛快攻完成上籃，熱火還是打出了一次不錯的配合而Haslem只需要多一點的耐心。再下一個圖片中，你會發現如果Haslem在他的位置上得到球的話，公牛的防守是極其破爛的(囧)。不僅僅是他能馬上在罰球線做出跳投，同時也能來個高低位傳球給 Curry(如果Noah上來協防)或是傳給Battier(如果Boozer上來協防)而找到防守者身後的空間或是切過對側。 http://0rz.tw/vjwou (圖) Upon further inspection, this turnover is an easily correctable mistake. Perhaps this concept and alignment will be something that Spolestra uses should the Bulls zone them again. 只要進一步檢查，這次的失誤將會是一個很容易糾正的錯誤。或許這個概念和策略會是 Spolestra在下次面對公牛區域聯防的利器。 The other things zones are notorious for giving up our offensive rebounds. In one possession, the Bulls actually gave up two offensive rebounds and only escaped due to a botched putback attempt by Haslem. In the following clip, a freeze-frame highlights a blockout dilemma for Kyle Korver. 另外一次臭名的聯防是我們失去了我們的進攻(防守)籃板。在一次球權中，公牛實際上丟掉了兩個進攻籃板，最後是在Haslem拙劣的補籃才躲過一劫。在下面的片段中，使用定格來突現了KK進退維谷的困境。 With Noah and Carlos Boozer moving to contest a shot from the corner, Korver is left to try to fend off two Heat players (Battier and Mike Miller) coming in from the weakside for the rebound. Korver chooses to throw his body in front of the hard-charging Miller, which opens up a gap for Haslem (left unimpeded by Rose) to sneak in for the third shot attempt. Haslem misses a great chance, but this possession highlights the rebounding problems zones bring. 當Noah和Boozer移動到角落防守的時候，KK隻身嘗試擊退兩名熱火球員(Battier和Miller) 從弱側前來衝搶籃板。KK選擇檔在來勢兇猛的Miller前面，開了一個門給Haslem(Rose沒有盯好)前來撿漏然後獲得第三次的出手。Haslem最終錯過了大好機會，無論如何這個影片讓我們看清楚公牛聯防產生的籃板問題。 (看完我真的笑了 KK一開始的發呆和Rose的看戲XDD ) http://0rz.tw/sOhkx (影片) With two more match-ups on the docket in the regular season, it will be interesting to see how much (if any) zone is used by Chicago. Perhaps last night was a one-time thing centered around a need to protect Rose given his foul trouble. Or perhaps it was a chance for Thibodeau to see if a zone has a chance to slow down the Heat come playoff time. Either way, this chess match will be fun to watch. 例行賽還會再對戰兩次，公牛會使用(如果有)多少聯防將會是非常有趣的看點。也許昨天晚上只是教練一時興起保護Rose的策略。又或者這會是Thibodeau用於觀察聯防是否有機會用在季後賽抵抗熱火的武器。無論如何，這盤棋都將非常精彩。 -- 討論公牛zone defence的文章這類文章還蠻有趣的不過不才只是個鍵盤翻譯手 (￣￣;) 不太懂這些有錯請指正Orz 歡迎大家討論~~ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 122.117.16.132