Re: 12月號HIT雜誌所談的變化球理論

看板Cobras作者MyDice (Laser Beam Focus)時間21年前 (2004/01/09 03:03)推噓4(4推 0噓 0→)

留言4則, 4人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

※ 引述《fscy (2001太空漫遊)》之銘言： : 陳正益寫的這篇文章確實是問題很多, 相信很多人都注意到了. : 很多段落的內容都有問題. 我想最大的根源就是來自於所謂的 : 真空理論. : 第118頁任何在大氣中移動的物體都會在他身後不斷造成短 : 暫的真空,也許短暫到只有千分之一秒.... : 我不知道哪一份科學文獻有提及這樣的描述, 特別是在流體力學 : 的書籍裡. 至少我還沒看到有使用"真空"的概念來解釋或描述流 : 場中流體複雜行為的書籍或網站. 可能不是指真空而是指球面上的氣流沒有turbulence 或是說陳正益所寫的問題在於--你感覺不到有風吹並不表示空氣不存在雖然碩士班畢業前我一直是念物理的, 但沒修過流體力學 :P 所以先把之前看到的post出來但裡面並不是談大氣中移動物體的身後事只是剛開始提到球的運動希望沒有作過度的引申如果post是太trivial的東西不要見怪 XD The most interesting actions in the game of baseball take place when velocities of the ball range from a few miles per hour(and Reynolds numbers of 10,000) to values near 120 mph(and Reynolds numbers near 20,000). For velocities in that range below about 50mp, the flow of the air around the ball is rather smooth, though trailing vortices are generated. This airflow does not actually reach the surface where there is a quiet boundary layer. A very small insect sitting on the moving ball would feel no breeze at all. At velocities about 200mph the flow penetrates the boundary layer(the insect would have to hold on very tightly to avoid being blown off) and the air at the boundary-and trailing behind the ball-is quite turbulent...... for balls traveling at the transition velocities between 50mph and 120mph, the flow can be smooth or turbulent, depending on the detailed character of the surface of the ball and its motion. from "The Physics of Baseball" by Robert K. Adair 這本是台灣翻的"牛頓打棒球" 版上有很多人一定都看過了 Robert K. Adair is an emeritus physics professor from Yale University and a member of National Academy of Sciences (類似於台灣的中研院院士). His research is concerned with the properties of the elementary particles and forces of the universe. He has ever been named "Physicist to National League" in 1987. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 169.237.17.64