Re: All aboard - at own risk

看板Cubs作者RollingWave (Lost in the Dark)時間18年前 (2007/08/21 05:55)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

稍微玩一下模仿 Fire Joe Morgan.... http://firejoemorgan.blogspot.com 1.小熊隊上的"小朋友" Marshall: 24, Murton 25, Theriot *27* Fontenot *27* Pie 22 .....這五個裡面只有一個真的算小朋友吧.... 　小熊平均年齡 29.2, Brewers 27.9 Cardinals 30.4 .... 有年輕化多少? = =b 洋基紅鳥這種比較老人化的都只比小熊平均年齡大一歲左右啊.... 2.Theriot ... ZR 的衡量效果有限.... fielding percentage那更是...只要不去接球就不會下降啦!!　把這位仁兄說成好像是gold glover? .286 avg..但.722 OPS..今年NL SS OPS .753 ....(但以近年小熊的SS 標準來說他真的很棒了orz) 3.牛棚...誰會瞬間炸一下很難說啊... Marmol 雖然投的很好但控球也是有點....而且已過去的經驗來看closer by commitee的下場通常..... 4.Kendall: 好歹Kendall生涯中也算是還不錯的打擊捕手了..(至少能上壘..) Koyie Hill 今年的"打擊”實在不是丁丁就能形容了....這裡的Sweet Lou繼續讓這位OPS+ =38　的強者繼續上 (大Ｚ OPS+ 57) 才有鬼...Kendall不整個炸回去的話應該絕對是先發到底了. Blanco回來也一樣 5.Murton那段, 這應該是說明了小熊的慘況吧... Murton連打三支HR後　ISOP =.120... ..這個水準大概比Neifi Perez的生涯水準略好一些...囧.... 6.Hill vs Lilly ... ummmm "Part of the difference can be traced to the fact that Hill has the lowest run support (3.27 per nine innings) in the league, while Lilly has the fifth-highest (6.07)." "But mostly the disparity is because Lilly has enough experience to escape trouble without flinching, while Hill is still learning how to stop fighting himself when things go wrong." 看了這段我噴茶了..... 原來Hill的戰績不好主要的原因是因為他關鍵時刻撐不住..他的run support比他的 ERA低是次要的...原來如此！！！！　ＳＯＧＡ！！！　 LOB% RISP no on Late and close (後面全用OPS+來看) Hill 79.1 91 96 *33* Lilly 74.9 79 82 76 相對來說, Hill其實跑者上壘時壓制力強化的程度恐怕比Lilly還好一些. 這篇還滿歡樂的.....尤其Hill那段真的無言了... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 125.224.194.14