PTT體育區 / FORMULA1 (F1 賽車)

[情報]Alonso: Strategy made no difference

看板FORMULA1 (F1 賽車)作者 (秋山祥子好正>///<)時間14年前 (2011/04/17 19:38), 編輯推噓15(15推 0噓 45→)
留言60則, 18人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Fernando Alonso believes a three-stop strategy would not have helped his cause much after struggling during the Chinese Grand Prix. The Ferrari driver finished down in a distant seventh position after opting for a two-stop strategy, which seemed to be the slower option today. 小新認為三停對他來說結果也不會太多不同, 還是認為車不夠快 The Spaniard, however, reckons a three-stopper would not have made much difference for him, as he reckons his car was simply not quick enough. 我們會看哪個(二停,三停)才是最好的 "We'll see now which one was the best," Alonso told Spanish television about the strategy. 當你有最快的車,(幾停)很容易選擇, 當你慢的時候,這比中樂透難(誤) 威伯今天證明了排位賽不是很重要。 "It's very easy to choose the strategy when you have the fastest car and it's very hard when you are slow. Webber today showed qualifying is not very important. 最重要的是要有個好的換胎策略，今年我們可以超車。 如我所說的，最簡單的是要有輛快車，像紅牛那樣，你可以三停，二停，一停(?) 然後上頒獎台 "The most important thing is to have a good tyre degradation and a good strategy, and this year we can overtake. As I say, the easiest thing is to have a quick car, like Red Bull, you pit three, two, one times and you end up on the podium. 我們要先提升賽車。 我不認為它有太大改變。 我們明顯比前面的車還慢, 所以我們最後取得這類似(前面比賽)的成績 "We need to improve the car above everything. I don't think it would have changed much. We were much slower than the cars we had in front so we would ended up with a similar result." Alonso否認了他的車有任何問題，後段比賽掉了幾個位置。 Alonso denied having had any issues with his car, despite losing several position during the latter part of the race. no,我們沒有任何特別問題。只是無法在比賽的任何時候夠快，不斷一點一滴的失去 位置。 我們決定二停，所以我們在比賽某些地方看起來位置還不錯,而其他人像子彈那樣 從後面追上來。 無論什麼位置,我們必須努力撐住完成比賽。 "No, we didn't have any particular problems. We just weren't fast at any point during the race and we kept on losing positions little by little. "Then we opted to go for two stops so it looked like we were in a good position during some points of the race and others where they were flying like bullets from behind. We had to try to hold on and finish the race in whatever position." http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/90821 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 210.208.10.134
→
04/17 19:39, , 1F
人不夠快
04/17 19:39, 1F
推
04/17 19:39, , 2F
他趕快練好起跑啦
04/17 19:39, 2F
→
04/17 19:42, , 3F
以前在雷諾時感覺他起跑很好，後來發現也許是雷諾的車起跑好
04/17 19:42, 3F
→
04/17 19:42, , 4F
尤其是看了上一戰以後感覺更強烈XDDDD
04/17 19:42, 4F
推
04/17 19:43, , 5F
三停是蠻笨的策略 不過二停的話成績也是差不多
04/17 19:43, 5F
推
04/17 19:43, , 6F
被罰過Jump start後 就一直軟到現在
04/17 19:43, 6F
推
04/17 19:43, , 7F
這叫一朝被蛇咬十年怕草繩？
04/17 19:43, 7F
→
04/17 19:44, , 8F
去年ALO就在這一站JUMPSTART
04/17 19:44, 8F
→
04/17 19:44, , 9F
當年就知道是因為Renault車的起跑好
04/17 19:44, 9F
→
04/17 19:45, , 10F
一樓最快
04/17 19:45, 10F
→
04/17 19:46, , 11F
依稀還記得!!!KIMI被嗆!!不會調車...誰誰誰調車高手
04/17 19:46, 11F
→
04/17 19:47, , 12F
事實證明....車好不好 早已注定....
04/17 19:47, 12F
→
04/17 19:48, , 13F
不過看來法拉利的研發團隊應該沒有以前強了，回想2006年那時
04/17 19:48, 13F
→
04/17 19:49, , 14F
賽季跑到一半，誰能想得到F248會大爆走。看看今年法拉利還能
04/17 19:49, 14F
→
04/17 19:49, , 15F
不能上演大驚奇。
04/17 19:49, 15F
→
04/17 19:50, , 16F
F248？是248 F1
04/17 19:50, 16F
→
04/17 19:50, , 17F
喔喔!感謝樓上糾正，記錯了XDD
04/17 19:50, 17F
推
04/17 19:50, , 18F
有沒力咖哩在不會有驚奇
04/17 19:50, 18F
推
04/17 19:50, , 19F
樓上正解
04/17 19:50, 19F
→
04/17 19:51, , 20F
248 F1當年是法拉利唱衰V8不會玩太久取的名字
04/17 19:51, 20F
→
04/17 19:51, , 21F
如果能上演大驚奇，那ALO對團隊的回饋效應應該就會出來了。
04/17 19:51, 21F
→
04/17 19:51, , 22F
恩....我不認為...
04/17 19:51, 22F
→
04/17 19:52, , 23F
248 F1季初也是很鳥，就跟麥拉崙09年一樣症頭
04/17 19:52, 23F
→
04/17 19:52, , 24F
我認真覺得法拉利在取名的時候不要取一些奇怪的比較好
04/17 19:52, 24F
→
04/17 19:53, , 25F
奇怪車名的那幾年從沒拿過冠軍
04/17 19:53, 25F
→
04/17 19:53, , 26F
其實248也沒鳥的很誇張啦!!!還跟的上R26跟MP4/21
04/17 19:53, 26F
推
04/17 19:53, , 27F
今年這台車取名的過程可以說是傷當不順阿XDD
04/17 19:53, 27F
→
04/17 19:54, , 28F
法拉利還是乖乖的取F20XX比較實在
04/17 19:54, 28F
推
04/17 19:54, , 29F
可能真的是像到F150 貨卡一台
04/17 19:54, 29F
→
04/17 19:54, , 30F
F20XX鳥的只有F2005
04/17 19:54, 30F
→
04/17 19:55, , 31F
其實F2205可能也不是台慢車，只是被規則和輪胎給玩死了...
04/17 19:55, 31F
→
04/17 19:56, , 32F
雖然F2008沒有贏車手冠軍!!不過當年最速車無誤
04/17 19:56, 32F
→
04/17 19:56, , 33F
試問F60,248F1,F150,F10各代表哪幾年？XD 一點都不好玩
04/17 19:56, 33F
推
04/17 19:56, , 34F
明年新車叫F56好了
04/17 19:56, 34F
→
04/17 19:57, , 35F
F5566 帝王之車
04/17 19:57, 35F
→
04/17 19:57, , 36F
其實我那時候超好奇F2005的前翼怎麼那麼平....
04/17 19:57, 36F
推
04/17 19:58, , 37F
搶不贏vet 搶贏web正賽還是輸=>小新:排位賽才不重要勒
04/17 19:58, 37F
→
04/17 19:58, , 38F
跟 R25 MP4/20的前翼比起來平到一個很奇怪...
04/17 19:58, 38F
→
04/17 19:59, , 39F
F2005的前翼給我的第一個感覺就是...好複雜XD！
04/17 19:59, 39F
推
04/17 19:59, , 40F
今年小新已經講N次 Anything can happen 結果nothing happen
04/17 19:59, 40F
→
04/17 19:59, , 41F
下一次他會說never say never
04/17 19:59, 41F
→
04/17 20:00, , 42F
講講KIMI的口頭禪吧XD
04/17 20:00, 42F
→
04/17 20:03, , 43F
let’s wait and see...(誤)
04/17 20:03, 43F
推
04/17 20:05, , 44F
it's very _____ when you are _____ 換個詞 又好幾句
04/17 20:05, 44F
→
04/17 20:05, , 45F
嗯?怎麼會有人提到MP4/21??....MP4/21很鳥耶+___+"
04/17 20:05, 45F
推
04/17 20:06, , 46F
06的麥拉崙可是一勝都沒有
04/17 20:06, 46F
→
04/17 20:07, , 47F
06英國站起跑結束JPM的F1生涯
04/17 20:07, 47F
→
04/17 20:07, , 48F
問到最後就 I...I dont want to know
04/17 20:07, 48F
→
04/17 20:08, , 49F
然後就開冰箱 拿出雪糕....
04/17 20:08, 49F
→
04/17 20:12, , 50F
其實MP4/21也沒那麼不堪...只是都有點莫名其妙
04/17 20:12, 50F
→
04/17 20:13, , 51F
MP4/21有好幾個竿位
04/17 20:13, 51F
→
04/17 20:13, , 52F
06開季KIMI最後一位殺到第3也很猛
04/17 20:13, 52F
→
04/17 20:14, , 53F
MP4/21真的不是那麼糟糕....
04/17 20:14, 53F
推
04/17 20:15, , 54F
F5566 跪~XDDD
04/17 20:15, 54F
推
04/17 20:46, , 55F
去年季中之後法拉拉的成績就開始提昇了 不曉得今年會不會也
04/17 20:46, 55F
→
04/17 20:46, , 56F
這樣...
04/17 20:46, 56F
→
04/17 21:13, , 57F
MP4/21 在當年麥拉崙是當作類似RB5的地位，亦即他是一個
04/17 21:13, 57F
→
04/17 21:14, , 58F
繼MP4/18-19＆19B-20後的三年計畫的首台車
04/17 21:14, 58F
→
04/17 21:15, , 59F
也是紐維在麥隊的遺作，後來的MP4/22跟23其實都算21當
04/17 21:15, 59F
→
04/17 21:15, , 60F
基礎開發出來的不過掌事者就變成後來鼎鼎大名的考夫蘭了
04/17 21:15, 60F
‣ 更多 MattiaPasini 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1Dgj4_J2 (FORMULA1)
FORMULA1 近期熱門文章
更多 近期熱門文章 >>
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
更多 即時熱門文章 >>
‣ 更多 MattiaPasini 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1Dgj4_J2 (FORMULA1)