Re: [新聞] 電話門續集即將上映，有完沒完？

看板Juventus作者Okuthor (不器用。)時間18年前 (2007/05/12 19:31)推噓3(3推 0噓 0→)

留言3則, 3人參與討論串5/5 (看更多)

※ 引述《Okuthor (不器用。)》之銘言： : http://www.channel4.com/sport/football_italia/apr14g.html : Judge: Juve safe, Messina at risk : Saturday 14 April, 2007 : -------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 負責電話門審判首部曲的法官保證 JUVE不會再被處分，Messina倒是可能被重罰。 : 負責聯邦法庭、把 JUVE下放乙級外帶－１７罰分的法官 Piero Sandulli說： : 「JUVE有什麼風險？我們的決定並非檢視單一事件， : 而是要對創造出有利於 JUVE的『氛圍』的情形作出裁決。」 : （所以他可以算得上是首部曲的導演吧我想…） : 「如果這些新加入被調查的比賽是該『氛圍』的一部分， : 我不相信 JUVE會在紀律條款遭受任何危險，那已經在體育事務上判決過了。」 : Messina就不是這樣了，實際上他們被電話門判決所救而免於降級， : 因為 JUVE被下放釋出了一個名額。 : 〔首部曲導演提到 Messina在續集中才是要角的幕前訪談，略過不翻。〕〔二部曲換角，結果現在被爆料要拍魔戒前傳《黑暗王朝》了…〕 http://www.channel4.com/sport/football_italia/may12a.html Ex-director accuses Juve Saturday 12 May, 2007 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The FIGC has called on former Juventus director Maurizio Capobianco to testify after claims the club gave expensive gifts to referees, the Federation and fans. 前 JUVE董事 Capobianco宣稱球會送高價禮品給裁判、足協與球迷之後，義足協傳喚他證實這些事。 The scandal erupted when Capobianco, who worked for the Bianconeri from 1984 to 2005, made the allegations in an interview with newspaper ‘La Repubblica.’ Capobianco於1984到2005年在 JUVE工作，在接受《La Repubblica》專訪時爆料。 “The Investigation Committee of the FIGC will ask Mr Capobianco to confirm what he knows, ascertaining if these facts really occurred and who are the people involved,” said a statement from investigator Francesco Saverio Borrelli. 足協調查員 Francesco Saverio Borrelli說：「義足協調查委員會將要求 Capobianco證實其所知，查明這些論據是否確實發生過，以及有哪些人涉案。」 “We hope that the former Juventus employee will want to collaborate to prove if his accusations are founded.” 「我們希望這位前 JUVE雇員願意合作以證明他的指控屬實。」 If the Committee is not satisfied that there is real truth to these allegations, then Capobianco risks severe punishment for defamation – with Juventus already announcing they will seek legal advice. 如果該委員會無法滿意這些申述的真實性，Capobianco將冒上被判誹謗罪的風險， JUVE已經宣佈將尋求法律建議。 “Only at the start of 2005 did I find out about at least four occasions in which Juve gave expensive items, of around ￡10,000 each, to two Italian referees, a member of the FIGC and one of the Covisoc,” Capobianco was quoted as saying in ‘La Repubblica.’ 《La Repubblica》引述 Capobianco的話：「只在2005年初我就發現至少四起事件，JUVE送出高價物品，每件約一萬英鎊，給兩名義大利裁判、一名義足協成員、一名義足協財務監督部門官員。」 “These were handed over via a third party who were somehow related to the referees. These incidents go back to the start of the Antonio Giraudo and Luciano Moggi administration in 1995.” 「這些物品透過以某種方式與裁判有關係的第三者轉交，這些事件可以回溯到 Giraudo、Moggi開始掌權的1995年。」 The Calciopoli scandal has only analysed the years 2004-05 and 2005-06, so this could in theory open up another trial. 電話門醜聞只分析2004-05、2005-06賽季，所以理論上可以重開另一次審判。 “Why do I speak out now? Because before Calciopoli what I saw where fragments of an affair that only came together to create meaning afterwards. Only now do I realise how they ruined a club with a 100-year history with the complicity of referees, journalists and the institutions.” 「為什麼我現在說出來？因為在電話門之前我所看到的只是破碎的片斷，在那之後合在一起看才產生意義，惟有到現在我才瞭解，他們是怎麼與裁判、記者與機構共謀毀了一家擁有百年歷史的球會。」 Capobianco also alleged that Juventus gave contracts to companies close to certain journalists for communication projects that “if Juve won the Scudetto, would be paid for, but never developed.” Capobianco也主張 JUVE為訊息計畫給予與親近某些記者的公司合約，『如果 JUVE贏得聯賽冠軍，他們就能收錢，但從沒被發現。』 He then insisted that the Semana srl company that in July 2003 took 30 per cent of Juve's shares was “used by Moggi and Giraudo to indirectly finance the Ultras. On the balance sheet there are entries for tens of thousands of Euros per match to buy choreographies, banners and all sorts.” 他接著堅稱 Semana srl公司在2003年七月拿了 JUVE三成的股份，『被 Giraudo、Moggi用於間接資助極端球迷團體，在收支表上有每場比賽一萬歐元的帳目用於編隊呼隊歌、買橫幅這類的事。』 Perhaps even more importantly for a club that could gain automatic promotion into Serie A next week, Capobianco insists that the departure of Moggi and Giraudo has changed nothing. 或許這比球會可能在來週取得直接升甲資格更重要， Capobianco堅決主張 Moggi、Giraudo的離職並沒有改變任何事。 “Today Alessio Secco makes all the decisions – the same man who in the past never moved a finger without Moggi's consent. Renato Opezzi remains, having always been Giraudo's right-hand man. Financial Director Michele Bergero and Marketing Director Fassone are still there. They call it the new Juve, but it's the same faces.” 「Secco在今天統籌一切，就是過去 Moggi沒點頭他連手指頭都動不了的那個人， Renato Opezzi還在，他一直都是 Giraudo的左右手，財務董事 Michele Bergero與行銷董事 Fassone也都還在，他們叫這個新 JUVE，不過仍是那些老面孔。」 As a final blast, Capobianco told ‘La Repubblica’ newspaper that Moggi had silenced even UEFA. Capobianco在《La Repubblica》最後爆料說 Moggi甚至能讓歐足聯閉嘴。 “I was stunned at how they managed to cover up a case when a player tested positive for cannabis. UEFA discovered it in 1997, told the FIGC and that was where it ended.” 「我對於他們在一名球員被檢驗出大麻陽性反應時也能夠掩蓋感到震驚，歐足聯在1997發現這件事，告知義足協，然後就沒了。」 Late Friday night Juventus released a statement denying all Capobianco's allegations, pointing out “these statements were aimed at swaying public opinion, as he is already involved in a legal challenge with the club. 週五晚間 JUVE釋出聲明否認 Capobianco的所有主張，指出『這些陳述的目標是動搖公眾判斷，他正涉入一起跟球會有關的法律挑戰』。 “The Bianconeri therefore intend to confront Capobianco in the appropriate venue. Juventus also confirm they have total faith in the organisation structure set out in November, one that has all the requisites to consent a correct and professional running of the club and to carry on the development proposals approved by the Board of Directors.” 「JUVE因此打算在適當的場合與 Capobianco對質， JUVE也對十一月開始的組織機構保有絕對信心，他們擁有正確並專業運作球會、並持續發展由董事會通過提議之計畫所需的一切要件。」－－ http://www.goal.com/it/Articolo.aspx?ContenutoId=300927 http://www.repubblica.it/2007/05/sezioni/sport/calcio/ capobianco-accusa/capobianco-accusa/capobianco-accusa.html 《La Repubblica》專訪 Capobianco的內容，兩個連結內容相同。 http://www.juventus.com/it/news/ detail.aspx?lml_language_id=0&trs_id=1203000&ID=11266 官網聲明稿，連結裡有pdf檔可以下載，可是只有義文版。 -- 先開槍繼續開槍. 直到所有人都死光了再開始問問題. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 124.8.132.11