[外電] Will You Please Rebound, Please? How …

看板Kings (沙加緬度國王)作者eliczone (C'est la vie)時間16年前 (2010/03/09 14:49)推噓2(2推 0噓 2→)

留言4則, 2人參與討論串1/1

http://0rz.tw/jf228 That the Kings struggle to rebound on defense is not new or surprising. Sacramento ranks 26th in defensive rebound percentage (72.4 percent), ahead of only the D'Antoni Knicks, the 7-55 Nets, the Gentry né D'Antoni Suns and the Nellieball Warriors. Given that the Kings tend to play fairly normal if somewhat larger line-ups, and have invested two lottery picks and a star two-guard (by way of trade) in the frontcourt, you can see why this problem in particular is so infuriating. 在講國王的防守籃板有多爛。 What's the root cause? Well, big men who aren't good rebounders, that's what. But really, how about some particular blame? How about some particularly liberating j'accuse!s, OK? 什麼問題呢？下面有數據。 I looked at the line-up data from Sunday's loss to Oklahoma City. Since no one Thunder player killed the Kings on the offensive glass in particular -- Russell Westbrook and Serge Ibaka each had three, five others each had two -- it stands to reason that we could glean something from looking at which Kings were on the floor when OKC grabbed them o-boards. What follows are all the Kings line-ups during which a defensive rebound opportunity was presented. (There were two other line-ups played by Paul Westphal, but there were no missed OKC shots in either short span.) The only numbers presented are each line-up's defensive rebounds, the number of defensive rebound opportunities said line-up had, and the defensive rebound percentage that shakes out to. (Note that the league average is 73.7 percent.) 這數據只顯示防守籃板的機會和搶下多少防守籃板。 Hawes-Landry-Greene-Evans-Udrih----9 defensive reb-15 opportunities, 60 percent Hawes-Landry-Nocioni-Garcia-Udrih----0-3, 0% Hawes-Landry-Nocioni-Evans-Udrih----2-3, 67% Hawes-Landry-Greene-Garcia-Evans----2-2, 100% Hawes-Thompson-Nocioni-Garcia-Evans----1-4, 25% Hawes-Thompson-McGuire-Garcia-Evans----0-1, 0% Thompson-Landry-Greene-Garcia-Evans----3-5, 60% Thompson-Landry-Udoka-Garcia-Udrih----3-4, 75% Thompson-Landry-Udoka-Evans-Udrih----3-3, 100% Thompson-Landry-Udoka-Garcia-Evans----2-3, 67% Thompson-Landry-Garcia-Evans-Udrih----2-3, 67% You'll notice I've separated these out by big-man combos. (You'll also notice Westphal stayed quite big through this game -- no Nocioni or Greene at power forward.) So let's just go ahead and sum that up ... 用大個子的組合來分類。 Hawes-Landry----13-23, 56% Hawes-Thompson----1-5, 20% Thompson-Landry----13-18, 72% Udoka's the best of the small forward on the defensive glass, but the difference between Ime and Nocioni isn't nearly big enough to explain why the Hawes line-ups rebounded so much worse than the Thompson-Landry ones. And the backcourts -- combinations of Garcia, Udrih and Evans -- are the same for each set of bigs. 在防守方面南哥是最好的SF人選，但南哥和Noc的差距並不足以解釋為什麼有Hawes在的陣容籃板遠遠爛於小湯和洗衣店的組合。而後場Cisco、Beno和REKE在每個大個子的組合的籃板數都是一樣的。 It's hard to avoid the obvious conclusion, isn't it? The two combinations which featured Hawes stunk on the defensive glass, and the combination without Hawes was pretty good. 很難去避免說出這麼明顯的結論，對吧？簡單來說就是Hawes在防守籃板方面爛透了，沒有 Hawes的組合很不錯。 *** This is but one factor of a game, of the team. But as it's the factor which plainly cost the Kings a chance at the game Sunday, it's worth wringing hands over. I, for one, would like to see if a Hawes-Joey Dorsey combination would still result in bad defensive rebounding. Dorsey is an excellent defensive rebounder (with our limited data on him), and it could turn out that while Hawes is a bad defensive rebounder, and Landry is a bad defensive rebounder, each can be saved by playing with good or great rebounders. (Why Hawes-Thompson doesn't work is beyond me.) 這是一場比賽中的其中一個因素。但這也是一個國王在禮拜天的比賽付出慘痛代價的因素。我會想要看看是否Hawes和多西的組合仍然會在防守籃板上這麼爛，多西是個傑出的防守籃板球員，而當Hawes和洗衣店都是不好的防守籃板球員時，也許會有效果，每個組合都可以有好的防守籃板(我也不懂為什麼Hawes和小湯起不了作用) ======================================================== Hawes，你什麼時候才能夠「穩定」地知道你自己的角色 -- -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.130.141.241