Re: [閒聊] 30Q：沙加緬度的倒數時鐘啟動？

看板Kings (沙加緬度國王)作者santabrelai時間15年前 (2010/09/30 09:38)推噓3(3推 0噓 4→)

留言7則, 2人參與討論串2/3 (看更多)

http://0rz.tw/9Gxy4 恕不翻譯 The Sacramento Kings have been trying for a few years now, and today, they're further away from a new arena than when they began. After the California Expo board ejected a plan that would have built arena in downtown Sacramento, the NBA has announced that they'll no longer be supporting the Kings efforts in Sacramento. It's a departure from the previous stand taken by the NBA--when David Stern pledged to personally lead the charge for a new arena--and it's hard not to take it as an ominous sign for the future. The NBA once pledged support for Seattle, too. Then the league pulled out over frustrations with the state legislature. And then... From the Sacramento Bee: "On the heels of the disappointing – but not surprising – action (or inaction) of the state and Cal Expo board, it is fair to say that the NBA has ceased its activities on the Sacramento arena front," league representative John Moag said in an e-mail to The Bee. "However, we will continue to monitor and respond to the activities and options of others that might reasonably ensure the competitiveness and viability of the Kings' franchise." The NBA wants us a new arena in Sacramento, but with no solution in sight, it seems this is the league throwing up its hands. The threat of "other options" hasn't been mentioned yet, but rest assured, it's implicit. When the NBA doesn't get what it wants... Well, look at the city of Seattle. That's a doomsday scenario that's still a ways off, of course. But with the rejection latest proposal and the NBA's sudden refusal to continue this battle, the Kings are a step closer to relocation than they were yesterday. Here's to hoping they don't get any closer. Read more at Sactown Royalty, and stay tuned for updates as the process continues. -- NBA官方看來的解法就是搬家了。 NBA has announced that they'll no longer be supporting the Kings efforts in Sacramento. 西雅圖粉絲們也在這篇文章的回應中發出了他們的怒吼。 -- 以下非為重點，請略。門票收入到底足不足以支持球隊呢？ http://www.forbes.com/lists/2009/32/basketball-values-09_Sacramento-Kings_32714 6.html Capacity: 17,317 Average Ticket Price: $62 17317*62=1073654 1073654*41=44019814 假設票價僅是價位*座位/總座位可能影響因素：公關票數量（Ex：軍人節時邀請軍人到場、NBA care以門票代替）包廂才是重要金錢來源？（大戶都買包廂可以看全年，還有Bar等）（在Google到的內容中，冠軍戰一場包廂達16萬美元？）（之前讀到的文章中，黃蜂搬離的原因之一，即為老舊主場缺乏包廂）優惠專案（Ex：十元還送你啤酒之夜、季票） http://espn.go.com/nba/attendance 上季國王觀眾數平均13,254人比例為76.5% 13254*62=821748 821748*41=33691668 以NBA官方數據而言（我不能百分之百肯定我Google到的東西是真實的官方數據....） http://www.espnstar.com.tw/news/basketball/2010/0929/188523.htm 總門票收入假設為報導中所寫的10億美金 http://www.alllw.com/shichangyingxiaolunwen/0HG5D22009.html http://www.chinavalue.net/media/Article.aspx?ArticleId=49251 10億/30*94/100 = 約為三千一百萬（*0.94乃因門票收入部分需上交NBA）實際門票收入，三十隊的平均值約為三千一百萬，約略與33691668之數字相當除了門票收入之外，尚有店家的簽約。 http://www.nba.com/kings/news/kings_food_beverage_09.html 總共二十家簽約店家。各店家在Arco Arena內分店數目不一。 http://www.nba.com/kings/tickets/ARCO_concessions_map.html 廣告簽約、球場冠名權也屬球隊收入的一部分，還有小球迷不會知道的一部分。以上加起來，足夠支付球團支出嗎？老闆每年要自掏腰包多少呢？因為這些都不是球團會公布的部分，當然也找不到解答，但只靠門票收入看來是無法取得收支平衡。 -- Google的可怕之處在於，你永遠不會知道你Google到的東西是真相還是嘴砲。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.67.167.90