[討論] Nash到底算不算頂級巨星啊?已回收
常有人說太陽隊成就了Nash,可是他在小牛時期也是很棒的後衛。
雖然數據可能不頂級,但是算是一個優秀的控衛,命中率也很神...
到太陽更扯了,連兩年MVP就不講了...
雖然O'Neal在的時候拖累整體速度,導致數據下降,可是他很老了...
當大歐離開後,他又差點變成助攻王... 印像只輸給Rondo Feat. Boston的紀錄檯。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REp0LkNPx2c
看這就知道他的數據也是很鬼神啊,為什麼討論他的人就比較不多呢?
是因為打法不夠勁爆嗎?
雖說因為先天疾病導致防守很破...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 106.1.16.62
推
10/04 00:35, , 1F
10/04 00:35, 1F
影響很大喔,不是數據好就代表沒影響喔。
→
10/04 00:36, , 2F
10/04 00:36, 2F
噓
10/04 00:36, , 3F
10/04 00:36, 3F
先天性的脊椎前移,要求訓練員幫他開防守菜單,訓練員直接叫他放棄
進攻影響很大喔,只是防守影響更大... 沒看Nash常常比賽,落差可以很大?
→
10/04 00:37, , 4F
10/04 00:37, 4F
噓
10/04 00:37, , 5F
10/04 00:37, 5F
→
10/04 00:38, , 6F
10/04 00:38, 6F
→
10/04 00:39, , 7F
10/04 00:39, 7F
推
10/04 00:39, , 8F
10/04 00:39, 8F
噓
10/04 00:41, , 9F
10/04 00:41, 9F
噓
10/04 00:41, , 10F
10/04 00:41, 10F
推
10/04 00:41, , 11F
10/04 00:41, 11F
→
10/04 00:42, , 12F
10/04 00:42, 12F
推
10/04 00:45, , 13F
10/04 00:45, 13F
推
10/04 00:45, , 14F
10/04 00:45, 14F
噓
10/04 00:45, , 15F
10/04 00:45, 15F
糗了,標題下不好,我只是想問為什麼他的討論度相對比較低?
明明數據也是很鬼神的...
※ 編輯: wayne654852 來自: 106.1.16.62 (10/04 00:47)
→
10/04 00:48, , 16F
10/04 00:48, 16F
→
10/04 00:49, , 17F
10/04 00:49, 17F
噓
10/04 00:49, , 18F
10/04 00:49, 18F
推
10/04 00:49, , 19F
10/04 00:49, 19F
→
10/04 00:49, , 20F
10/04 00:49, 20F
→
10/04 00:50, , 21F
10/04 00:50, 21F
→
10/04 00:51, , 22F
10/04 00:51, 22F
→
10/04 00:51, , 23F
10/04 00:51, 23F
推
10/04 00:54, , 24F
10/04 00:54, 24F
→
10/04 00:55, , 25F
10/04 00:55, 25F
→
10/04 00:55, , 26F
10/04 00:55, 26F
推
10/04 00:56, , 27F
10/04 00:56, 27F
推
10/04 00:57, , 28F
10/04 00:57, 28F
推
10/04 00:58, , 29F
10/04 00:58, 29F
→
10/04 00:59, , 30F
10/04 00:59, 30F
噓
10/04 00:59, , 31F
10/04 00:59, 31F
推
10/04 01:01, , 32F
10/04 01:01, 32F
→
10/04 01:01, , 33F
10/04 01:01, 33F
→
10/04 01:02, , 34F
10/04 01:02, 34F
→
10/04 01:03, , 35F
10/04 01:03, 35F
推
10/04 01:03, , 36F
10/04 01:03, 36F
噓
10/04 01:04, , 37F
10/04 01:04, 37F
噓
10/04 01:04, , 38F
10/04 01:04, 38F
推
10/04 01:07, , 39F
10/04 01:07, 39F
推
10/04 01:08, , 40F
10/04 01:08, 40F
→
10/04 01:08, , 41F
10/04 01:08, 41F
→
10/04 01:10, , 42F
10/04 01:10, 42F
噓
10/04 01:10, , 43F
10/04 01:10, 43F
→
10/04 01:10, , 44F
10/04 01:10, 44F
→
10/04 01:16, , 45F
10/04 01:16, 45F
是Marion成就Nash跟Amare... 當然Nash也成就他成為當初聯盟最會跑快攻的前鋒吧!
哥也是死忠Nash迷,當初看球時還沒用PTT啊啊啊!
Penny多久的人了,還可以討論成這樣! Nash還沒退啊啊啊~~!
※ 編輯: wayne654852 來自: 106.1.16.62 (10/04 01:19)
推
10/04 01:33, , 46F
10/04 01:33, 46F
→
10/04 01:44, , 47F
10/04 01:44, 47F
推
10/04 01:59, , 48F
10/04 01:59, 48F
噓
10/04 02:30, , 49F
10/04 02:30, 49F
噓
10/04 02:50, , 50F
10/04 02:50, 50F
噓
10/04 02:55, , 51F
10/04 02:55, 51F
推
10/04 06:39, , 52F
10/04 06:39, 52F
噓
10/04 07:27, , 53F
10/04 07:27, 53F
噓
10/04 09:05, , 54F
10/04 09:05, 54F
→
10/04 09:06, , 55F
10/04 09:06, 55F
→
10/04 09:07, , 56F
10/04 09:07, 56F
→
10/04 09:07, , 57F
10/04 09:07, 57F
→
10/04 09:08, , 58F
10/04 09:08, 58F
噓
10/04 09:15, , 59F
10/04 09:15, 59F
→
10/04 09:15, , 60F
10/04 09:15, 60F
噓
10/04 09:54, , 61F
10/04 09:54, 61F
噓
10/04 10:19, , 62F
10/04 10:19, 62F
噓
10/04 10:59, , 63F
10/04 10:59, 63F
上面已經有人推文說不到超級巨星了,請問是廢文嗎?
標題下錯,但只是在詢問為何討論度這麼低,要不要去...?
噓
10/04 11:13, , 64F
10/04 11:13, 64F
呵呵,我第二還第三年使用PTT,不過回去搜尋,的確討論度沒有現在幾位控衛高...
※ 編輯: wayne654852 來自: 106.1.16.62 (10/04 11:16)
噓
10/04 12:07, , 65F
10/04 12:07, 65F
我從05年開始看,然後最近兩三年用PTT!
我標題下很爛的確欠噓,但是噓也噓的有內容好嗎?
噓
10/04 12:16, , 66F
10/04 12:16, 66F
→
10/04 12:44, , 67F
10/04 12:44, 67F
Channing Frye... 我印像超深刻... 看到5年三千萬都傻眼了...
※ 編輯: wayne654852 來自: 106.1.16.62 (10/04 15:44)
推
10/04 15:51, , 68F
10/04 15:51, 68F
推
10/04 18:08, , 69F
10/04 18:08, 69F
推
10/04 18:11, , 70F
10/04 18:11, 70F
我看好幾年了... 只是我只看比賽... 當初的第一人,結果討論度這麼低...
應該說難過,當初這麼強的人,被嫌成這樣...
推
10/04 18:45, , 71F
10/04 18:45, 71F
噓
10/04 18:52, , 72F
10/04 18:52, 72F
哇哇哇~ 你有仔細看推文嗎? 有人說他不是頂級巨星啊! 做夢該醒囉!
推
10/04 22:09, , 73F
10/04 22:09, 73F
小牛三劍客,只能回憶啊!
噓
10/04 22:44, , 74F
10/04 22:44, 74F
噓
10/05 00:51, , 75F
10/05 00:51, 75F
你敢說沒嗎? 沒拖累步調嗎?
※ 編輯: wayne654852 來自: 106.1.16.62 (10/05 13:38)
討論串 (同標題文章)
NBA 近期熱門文章
92
156
26
48
132
184
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章