Re: [討論] kobe是近代nba中不可跨越的障礙嗎?已回收
※ 引述《heatthree (熱火三)》之銘言:
: ※ 引述《hazel0093 (Volksgrenadier)》之銘言:
: 原文恕刪
: 單純列一下聯盟幾個球星不同球季的PER值
: PER 球季
: LBJ 31.7 08-09 (LBJ生涯最高)
: LBJ 31.6 12-13
: LBJ 31.1 09-10
: LBJ 30.7 11-12
: KD 30.5 13-14 (KD生涯最高)
: Wade 30.4 08-09 (Wade生涯最高)
: LBJ 29.1 13-14
: LBJ 29.1 07-08
: Wade 28.9 06-07
: KD 28.3 12-13
: LBJ 28.1 05-06
: Wade 28.0 09-10
: Kobe 28.0 05-06 (Kobe生涯最高)
: 13-14 賽季還沒打完,所以13-14的數據還會改變
: 提供給大家參考一下
那我取數位球星生涯PER前三高球季來排名
PER 球季
Billups 23.6 07-08
Billups 23.4 05-06
Marbury 22.7 00-01
Kidd 22.5 98-99
Kidd 22.2 02-03
Marbury 21.9 04-05
Billups 21.3 06-07
Marbury 20.8 98-99
Kidd 19.7 03-04
根據火火邏輯(至少顛峰那三年時期)
Billups>Marbury>=Kidd
誰說馬大少不如Kidd的,出來比PER值呀!
另外我發現史上第一控是Chris Paul
PER 球季
Paul 30.0 08-09
Paul 28.3 07-08
Big O 27.6 63-64
Paul 27.0 11-12
Magic 27.0 86-87
Magic 26.9 88-89
Big O 26.7 64-65
Magic 26.6 89-90
Big O 26.0 61-62
Stockton 23.9 89-90
Stockton 23.4 90-91
Stockton 23.3 94-95
別說不同年代不能比,之前腿迷戰指環王PER時怎麼說的自己爬文複習
最後
PER 年代
Wade 30.4 08-09
Wade 28.9 06-07
Wade 28.0 09-10
Wade 27.6 05-06
Wade 26.3 11-12
Wade 25.6 10-11
Bosh 25.0 09-10
Gasol 24.1 06-07
哼,老大真沒用,連抱大腿都比詹皇的二弟三弟細一點
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.168.168.172
推
03/23 03:23, , 1F
03/23 03:23, 1F
→
03/23 03:23, , 2F
03/23 03:23, 2F
推
03/23 03:26, , 3F
03/23 03:26, 3F
推
03/23 03:27, , 4F
03/23 03:27, 4F
推
03/23 03:28, , 5F
03/23 03:28, 5F
推
03/23 03:29, , 6F
03/23 03:29, 6F
推
03/23 03:29, , 7F
03/23 03:29, 7F
推
03/23 03:34, , 8F
03/23 03:34, 8F
推
03/23 03:38, , 9F
03/23 03:38, 9F
推
03/23 03:43, , 10F
03/23 03:43, 10F
推
03/23 03:43, , 11F
03/23 03:43, 11F
Shaq 30.6 30.6 30.2 比Wade粗些
老大的五冠是各抱一隻腿
詹皇的兩冠則是左擁右抱
推
03/23 03:45, , 12F
03/23 03:45, 12F
→
03/23 03:46, , 13F
03/23 03:46, 13F
※ 編輯: RodrigueZ810 來自: 118.168.168.172 (03/23 03:53)
→
03/23 03:48, , 14F
03/23 03:48, 14F
我只是依照某族群PER值定強弱的邏輯整理而已
不服氣麻煩您去找PER至上的人說理(我不是)
※ 編輯: RodrigueZ810 來自: 118.168.168.172 (03/23 03:57)
推
03/23 03:56, , 15F
03/23 03:56, 15F
推
03/23 03:59, , 16F
03/23 03:59, 16F
推
03/23 04:04, , 17F
03/23 04:04, 17F
我貼Nash幹嘛...我又沒說??>>>Nash
他貼PER我回PER也不行哦...
→
03/23 04:12, , 18F
03/23 04:12, 18F
→
03/23 04:12, , 19F
03/23 04:12, 19F
→
03/23 04:14, , 20F
03/23 04:14, 20F
→
03/23 04:16, , 21F
03/23 04:16, 21F
貼PER戰強弱腿迷行之有年,你們能用PER戰老大,我拿PER戰別人就不行?
你們能這樣貼來暗喻LBJ>Kobe我就不能反諷這種比法?
最後說老大抱大腿輸詹皇哪裡偏題了
推
03/23 04:21, , 22F
03/23 04:21, 22F
※ 編輯: RodrigueZ810 來自: 118.168.168.172 (03/23 04:29)
推
03/23 05:36, , 23F
03/23 05:36, 23F
推
03/23 06:41, , 24F
03/23 06:41, 24F
推
03/23 06:43, , 25F
03/23 06:43, 25F
推
03/23 06:55, , 26F
03/23 06:55, 26F
推
03/23 07:09, , 27F
03/23 07:09, 27F
→
03/23 07:10, , 28F
03/23 07:10, 28F
→
03/23 08:09, , 29F
03/23 08:09, 29F
→
03/23 08:10, , 30F
03/23 08:10, 30F
→
03/23 08:13, , 31F
03/23 08:13, 31F
→
03/23 08:14, , 32F
03/23 08:14, 32F
→
03/23 08:15, , 33F
03/23 08:15, 33F
推
03/23 08:24, , 34F
03/23 08:24, 34F
→
03/23 08:39, , 35F
03/23 08:39, 35F
推
03/23 08:43, , 36F
03/23 08:43, 36F
推
03/23 09:10, , 37F
03/23 09:10, 37F
噓
03/23 09:49, , 38F
03/23 09:49, 38F
推
03/23 10:41, , 39F
03/23 10:41, 39F
→
03/23 11:03, , 40F
03/23 11:03, 40F
原來CP3史上第一控已經沒啥問題了
魔術Stockton洗洗睡了吧
推
03/23 11:13, , 41F
03/23 11:13, 41F
→
03/23 11:14, , 42F
03/23 11:14, 42F
噓
03/23 11:29, , 43F
03/23 11:29, 43F
亂?用腿迷的比例尺(PER值)來幫球員劃定強弱叫亂?
你簡直是腿迷公敵..
噓
03/23 11:37, , 44F
03/23 11:37, 44F
推
03/23 12:01, , 45F
03/23 12:01, 45F
→
03/23 12:02, , 46F
03/23 12:02, 46F
推
03/23 12:10, , 47F
03/23 12:10, 47F
推
03/23 12:19, , 48F
03/23 12:19, 48F
噓
03/23 12:36, , 49F
03/23 12:36, 49F
我從沒說看得分才是對的,至少我隨便一找PER值定強弱的反例就出來了
還是你要認可Billups>Marbury>=Kidd、CP3史上第一控
老大的第二根大腿比詹皇的二弟三弟的大腿還細?
噓
03/23 12:54, , 50F
03/23 12:54, 50F
他最粗無誤,不過兩大腿綁一起應該會更粗
推
03/23 13:20, , 51F
03/23 13:20, 51F
※ 編輯: RodrigueZ810 來自: 118.168.168.172 (03/23 15:22)
噓
03/23 16:29, , 52F
03/23 16:29, 52F
→
03/23 16:30, , 53F
03/23 16:30, 53F
→
03/23 16:30, , 54F
03/23 16:30, 54F
推
03/23 17:51, , 55F
03/23 17:51, 55F
噓
03/24 12:55, , 56F
03/24 12:55, 56F
噓
02/15 21:12, , 57F
02/15 21:12, 57F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 13 篇):
NBA 近期熱門文章
60
119
276
536
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章