[洋基] Call off the contract on Kennedy

看板NY-Yankees作者 (金小三)時間17年前 (2008/08/10 17:19), 編輯推噓13(1304)
留言17則, 13人參與, 最新討論串1/4 (看更多)
(試翻一下練練英文,翻得不好請指正) From Peter Abraham's blog http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/08/10/call-off-the-contract-on-kennedy/ Call off the contract on Kennedy Ian Kennedy has pitched in 13 games for the Yankees. He is 1-4 with a 6.14 ERA. In 57.2 innings, he has allowed 63 hits and 40 earned runs. 阿甘在洋基投了 13 場的球,戰績 1 勝 4 敗,ERA 6.14 57.2 局被敲 63 安,責失 40 分。 He’s a finesse pitcher on the small side who was a high pick in the draft and now people think he’s a bust. 他當初是在選秀時以蠻高的順位被選進來的控球型投手, 現在被人認為是失敗者。 There’s was a finesse lefty on the smallish side who was a high pick in the draft back in 1984. His first 13 games? 2-7 with a 5.16 ERA. In 75 innings he allowed 78 hits and 43 earned runs. Everybody thought he was a bust, too. 1984 年時有一位在選秀時以蠻高的順位被選進來的控球型左投手, 前 13 場出賽,戰績 2 勝 7 敗,ERA 5.16。他 75 局被敲 78 安, 責失 43 分。當時大家也都認為他是個失敗者。 His name was Tom Glavine. He now has 305 wins, a World Series ring and will be elected to the Hall of Fame just as soon as he’s eligible. 他的名字叫 Tom Glavine。現在他(生涯) 305 勝,拿過一次冠軍戒, 一旦合格,他將立刻被選進名人堂。 No, I’m not saying Ian Kennedy is going to be Tom Glavine. I am saying that 12 games and 58.2 innings are not enough to judge him on. Yes, he said something stupid the other night. You never said something stupid when you were his age? 我不是在說阿甘會像 Tom Glavine 一樣,我是說 12 場 58.2 局的 投球不足以對他加以論定。是啦,他那晚是說了一些蠢話,你在他 這個年紀就沒說過蠢話? People who have never met Ian think he’s some kind of jerk. One rabid e-mailer just informed me that Ian is “clearly a loser.” Another criticized him for getting married during the playoffs last season. Never mind that those plans were made a year ahead of time before he had picked up a ball for the Yankees. 沒遇過阿甘的人會以為他是個笨蛋,有個激進派的人 E-mail 跟我說 阿甘絕對是失敗者。另外有個人批判他在去年季後賽期間結婚的事。 都不管他在開始為洋基投球之前(球隊)所做的年度計劃。 Just calm down. Joe Girardi will talk to Kennedy and tell him why what he said was wrong. Dave Eiland, Rafael Chaves and Nardi Contreras will coach him up. I bet Mike Mussina pulls him aside for a chat. Or maybe Andy Pettitte will handle it. 冷靜下來。吉總會跟阿甘談談,跟他說他那些話錯在哪裡。投手教練團 會訓練他。我想穆帥一定會把他拉到一旁談談,或許派派會去處理。 I have no idea whether he’ll be any good or not. But let’s give him a chance. 我不知道阿甘會不會有所進步,不過給他個機會吧。 New York baseball fans are supposed to be smart. Smart baseball fans don’t overreact to small sample sizes. 紐約棒球迷應該是聰明的。聰明的棒球迷不會對小樣本(數據)反應過度。 You wanted them to develop prospects? This is what it’s all about. For every game where Joba sticks it to the Red Sox at Fenway, you get somebody else getting knocked around in Anaheim. It’s all part of the process. (這段不太確定該怎麼翻...XD 是說被批評就會進步?) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 122.126.9.236

08/10 17:22, , 1F
失敗是新秀的養成過程中必要的一部分
08/10 17:22, 1F

08/10 17:24, , 2F
感謝推
08/10 17:24, 2F

08/10 17:29, , 3F
雖然大家都知道,但是想罵的衝動忍不住啊
08/10 17:29, 3F

08/10 17:30, , 4F
很多大投手前兩年也投得不怎樣,再看看
08/10 17:30, 4F

08/10 17:36, , 5F
馬的,我有沒有搞錯?彼得胖也用這種語不驚人死不休的標題
08/10 17:36, 5F

08/10 17:43, , 6F
很多大投手前兩年也投得不怎樣,再看看
08/10 17:43, 6F

08/10 17:43, , 7F
更多小投手前兩年也投得不怎樣,再看看
08/10 17:43, 7F

08/10 17:44, , 8F
球是圓的 再看看
08/10 17:44, 8F

08/10 18:00, , 9F
被批評OK啦,想辦法證明自己比較重要
08/10 18:00, 9F

08/10 19:38, , 10F
更多的是前兩年投不怎樣 後來更不怎樣甚至消失
08/10 19:38, 10F

08/10 19:39, , 11F
不過他的高順位總是讓人期待一下
08/10 19:39, 11F

08/10 19:42, , 12F
順位高不代表就養的起來;C.J. Henry就是很好的例子
08/10 19:42, 12F

08/10 20:00, , 13F
看到CJ就想到Abreu,哈哈
08/10 20:00, 13F

08/10 20:09, , 14F
請問Tom Glavine是否退休了? 不然都沒看到他投球=.=
08/10 20:09, 14F

08/10 20:12, , 15F
DL
08/10 20:12, 15F

08/10 20:54, , 16F
謝謝回答:)
08/10 20:54, 16F

08/10 23:32, , 17F
這些新秀怎麼都有不可思議的愛阿
08/10 23:32, 17F
文章代碼(AID): #18dhAIb9 (NY-Yankees)
文章代碼(AID): #18dhAIb9 (NY-Yankees)