PTT體育區 / NY-Yankees

Re: [閒聊] Javy Vazquez

看板NY-Yankees作者 ( ⊙o⊙)時間16年前 (2010/05/05 03:41), 編輯推噓11(11推 0噓 44→)
留言55則, 13人參與, 7年前最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
→
05/05 03:29,
你要不要先去查一查當時Eiland要王姿勢要怎麼調整
05/05 03:29
→
05/05 03:32,
他要王"手臂抬高點" MLB節目比對的則是王的放球點
05/05 03:32
→
05/05 03:33,
比19勝時高 最近國民比對的依舊是王的放球點過高
05/05 03:33
→
05/05 03:34,
如果你要說這也算Eiland有指出過王的arm slot有差 那
05/05 03:34
→
05/05 03:34,
或許也算吧 >~.~<
05/05 03:34
內文說Eiland的方法如果成功的話，葛格的realese point可以再降下來 請問「Eiland要葛格的手臂抬高點」的方法從何而來？ http://yankees.lhblogs.com/ Since several of you mentioned it – and I’m all about obliging the loyal readers – I chatted briefly with Dave Eiland this morning about Wang’s issues with his sinker. Specifically, we talked about his release point and arm slot. Eiland said that yes, there’s clearly a difference in Wang’s release point from when his sinker was consistently good to right now. What they are working with Wang on, Eiland said, is “staying over the rubber” longer. As you all know, Wang has a very deliberate wind-up – he raises his leg incredibly slowly and does a little “tap-tap” with the ball before throwing. The problem, according to Eiland, is that the “tap-tap” is coming a little later and Wang’s lower body has already started to push forward toward the plate. That means he’s forced to release the point at a higher point and thus, there’s no bite on the sinker and it hangs up. If Wang is able to stay over the rubber long, Eiland said, the “tap-tap” will take place with his body still in one location – as opposed to the lower half having already started forward – and his release point will be lower again. That’s what they’re focusing on now. Sorry if this is a little more technical than some of you might be interested in – I know it would be for me – but since Wang’s issues have been dissected by many on here, I thought those of you curious might find it interesting. -- 不在球場也能寫洋基、棒球。http://tinbeingnyy.blogspot.com/ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.32.56.18
→
05/05 07:01, , 1F
也許又是個翻譯的誤解??不過話又說回來,有這麼嚴重
05/05 07:01, 1F
→
05/05 07:02, , 2F
的傷,除非動刀不然救不回來吧??
05/05 07:02, 2F
推
05/05 10:01, , 3F
一篇文打死
05/05 10:01, 3F
→
05/05 10:49, , 4F
睡醒重新看了相關的評論與資料 你這篇資料根本證明不
05/05 10:49, 4F
→
05/05 10:49, , 5F
了Eiland稱職
05/05 10:49, 5F
→
05/05 10:50, , 6F
1.2009/4/14美國專業鄉民提出放球點的問題
05/05 10:50, 6F
→
05/05 10:51, , 7F
05/05 10:51, 7F
→
05/05 10:53, , 8F
2.2009/4/12王再自由時報訪問中 提到出手角度抬得比
05/05 10:53, 8F
→
05/05 10:53, , 9F
較高
05/05 10:53, 9F
→
05/05 10:54, , 10F
3.2009/4/19 MLB Tonight節目中比對王的受傷前後姿勢
05/05 10:54, 10F
→
05/05 10:56, , 11F
4.2009/5/14你這篇文章被PO出 Eiland開始提到放球點
05/05 10:56, 11F
→
05/05 10:56, , 12F
都過去了...投教對A好不見得對B有用
05/05 10:56, 12F
→
05/05 10:56, , 13F
應該降低
05/05 10:56, 13F
→
05/05 10:57, , 14F
看完電視才發現問題的投教 會是個好投教?
05/05 10:57, 14F
推
05/05 11:01, , 15F
看完數據才發現問題的教練 會是個好教練?
05/05 11:01, 15F
→
05/05 11:09, , 16F
4/19號Eiland才提到葛格的mechanics和以前不同...
05/05 11:09, 16F
→
05/05 11:11, , 17F
http://tinyurl.com/29pra43 後來的才是處理方式...
05/05 11:11, 17F
→
05/05 11:12, , 18F
何來看電視才發現？
05/05 11:12, 18F
→
05/05 11:14, , 19F
電視就是4/19播出 記得當時還有美國記者拿這個問題問
05/05 11:14, 19F
→
05/05 11:15, , 20F
吉總 他的回應是會回去看錄影帶了解
05/05 11:15, 20F
→
05/05 11:17, , 21F
Girardi在4/14發現葛格有問題....
05/05 11:17, 21F
→
05/05 11:20, , 22F
同時4/14，Eiland向NYTimes說葛格機制上的問題...
05/05 11:20, 22F
→
05/05 11:20, , 23F
Tyler Kepner有寫出來...
05/05 11:20, 23F
→
05/05 11:22, , 24F
如果Eiland是否無能只圍繞在葛格是否能修好...
05/05 11:22, 24F
→
05/05 11:23, , 25F
這觀點還蠻有趣的...
05/05 11:23, 25F
→
05/05 11:26, , 26F
所以說Eiland對去年前半季掙扎的投手群在下半季回穩
05/05 11:26, 26F
→
05/05 11:26, , 27F
可說是一點幫助都沒有...
05/05 11:26, 27F
→
05/05 11:26, , 28F
受傷了是要怎麼修啊,科科;話又說回來了,洋基從去年下
05/05 11:26, 28F
→
05/05 11:27, , 29F
半季到現在的投手群都算是很穩定了,難道Eiland沒有功
05/05 11:27, 29F
→
05/05 11:28, , 30F
勞嗎??還是說那些都是捕手配球好 XD
05/05 11:28, 30F
推
05/05 11:29, , 31F
先發除了JAVY~每一個ERA都小於3~超舒服的陣容的~
05/05 11:29, 31F
→
05/05 11:31, , 32F
在MLB Tonight 播出前Girardi與Eiland所說的投球機制
05/05 11:31, 32F
→
05/05 11:32, , 33F
有問題 並不是你這篇說的放球點偏高 而是其他的理由
05/05 11:32, 33F
→
05/05 11:34, , 34F
另外 如果去年下半季投手群有全面回穩 Girardi有需要
05/05 11:34, 34F
→
05/05 11:35, , 35F
冒險使用3個先發打世界大賽?(雖然最後結果是完美的)
05/05 11:35, 35F
→
05/05 11:36, , 36F
一個Joba不穩，就代表投手群不算回穩...受教了
05/05 11:36, 36F
推
05/05 11:36, , 37F
放球點是機制出問題或身體帶傷之後的果
05/05 11:36, 37F
推
05/05 11:37, , 38F
阿去年就沒有很穩的4 5號先發阿...-_-
05/05 11:37, 38F
推
05/05 11:41, , 39F
m現在是執著在Eiland跟MLB tonight誰先指出放球點不
05/05 11:41, 39F
→
05/05 11:42, , 40F
同這點來判定Eiland是不對的
05/05 11:42, 40F
→
05/05 11:45, , 41F
台灣第一個發現葛格出手點有變高而且有講出來的...
05/05 11:45, 41F
→
05/05 11:46, , 42F
搞不好是蛇板的abc....
05/05 11:46, 42F
→
05/05 11:49, , 43F
可憐的Gaudin 這麼快就被忘光了
05/05 11:49, 43F
推
05/05 11:52, , 44F
同一個老師教出來的學生 其他人都得A 只有一個得B-
05/05 11:52, 44F
→
05/05 11:53, , 45F
你就要因為那個得B-的學生 去責怪那個老師嗎?
05/05 11:53, 45F
→
05/05 11:53, , 46F
你怎麼不想想到底問題是出在老師還是學生身上
05/05 11:53, 46F
推
05/05 11:58, , 47F
Gaudin去年在我們這裡投得感覺不錯是因為
05/05 11:58, 47F
→
05/05 11:59, , 48F
他很強運...帳面ERA3.43 FIP卻是5.29...LOB% 88.6%
05/05 11:59, 48F
推
05/05 14:35, , 49F
老師的比喻很棒XDDD
05/05 14:35, 49F
推
05/05 21:56, , 50F
科科 重點很明顯啊 Joba Vaz根本不重要吧 XD
05/05 21:56, 50F
推
05/05 23:28, , 51F
我滿想知道有哪隊從1號穩到5號的
05/05 23:28, 51F
→
05/05 23:28, , 52F
帳gen的說法..大概沒有合格的投教了
05/05 23:28, 52F
→
05/06 05:36, , 53F
樓上你在跳針嘛? 我有說過投教不好嘛? 所以樓上的意
05/06 05:36, 53F
→
05/06 05:40, , 54F
是說我認為4 5號不穩是投教的問題??
05/06 05:40, 54F
→
12/28 13:54, 7年前 , 55F
冒險使用3個先發打世界 http://yofuk.com
12/28 13:54, 55F
‣ 更多 jayin07 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1Bu7XgYu (NY-Yankees)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
46
113
[閒聊] Javy Vazquez
genteme
16年前, 05/04
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇)：
排序： 最新先 | 最舊先 | 留言數
11
55
Re: [閒聊] Javy Vazquez
jayin07
16年前, 05/05
46
113
[閒聊] Javy Vazquez
genteme
16年前, 05/04
在新視窗開啟完整討論串 (共2篇)
NY-Yankees 近期熱門文章
更多 近期熱門文章 >>
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
更多 即時熱門文章 >>
‣ 更多 jayin07 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1Bu7XgYu (NY-Yankees)