Re: 〔印城星報〕溜馬隊在風中留下變數

看板PACERS (印第安那溜馬)作者gonzdevour (吞食)時間19年前 (2006/01/04 15:15)推噓1(1推 0噓 0→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串3/5 (看更多)

我們來想想這之間的因果關係: 1. I've got news: The Heat aren't offering Dwyane Wade any time in the near future. There are no great deals out there, or even good ones. There are only deals that are somewhat-less-than-unpalatable. 聽聽這個吧：熱火隊在可見的將來「不會」釋出 Dwyane Wade 。而市場上已經沒有很棒的交易了，甚至沒有幾個「好」的交易。只有許多ＳＯＳＯ等級的交易。 2. This is the ugly reality they've created for this wounded franchise. And if they think they're going to get lucky if they stick around until closing time -- the Feb. 23 trade deadline -- they're sadly mistaken. 這就是管理階層替受創的球隊所創造的醜陋情境。如果他們覺得等到交易截止日２月２３號一切會好轉，他們真的是錯得可悲。 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 我看不出"市場上沒有好交易"為何是"管理階層所創造的情境"。如果Kravitz老師要論證這點，他必須提出更進一步的說明。比較合理的說法是:"市場上沒有好交易，所以造成管理階層無法動作。" 除非他有一些事例可以證明，"本來有好交易，但被你管理階層弄砸了"；然而綜觀全文，我找不到哪裡可以支持他的結論。 "本來有好交易，但被弄砸了"這個觀點，倒是讓我回想起一件事。試問在怎樣的情形下比較有可能出現好交易? 如果當時阿泰默不作聲，如果當時Mike Wells老師在訪談時告訴阿泰此舉的可能後果，而不是急急忙忙為了出鋒頭，套了話之後立即在星報爆料，那麼，也許本來可以有好交易的。 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 針對Saras的酸文: 3. So far, Bird has done little more than change coaches and sign Sarunas Jasikevicius, who was advertised as a shooter and has delivered at a 43 percent clip. (Hello, Freddie Jones.) 目前為止，除了簽下號稱是「射手」、目前命中率４３％的 Sarunas Jasikevicius 之外， Bird 沒做什麼。（等等，我們隊上好像有個叫做 Fred Jones 的球員，目前命中率也有４４％，出手次數相差也不多啊） 4. Explain this to me: Why is Jackson viewed as a poisonous（毒瘤） hothead （莽夫）, but Jasikevicius, who is just as demonstrative （敢說）, is viewed as a vocal, passionate leader? 誰來告訴我：為什麼 Jackson 被看成莽夫、毒瘤，而一樣經常發言的 Jasikevicius 被看成是有想法、熱情的領袖？ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 我們來看兩位當地球迷對小葉最近低潮的看法: http://www2.indystar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=132060 Rubalamp97網友: I have seen the plays in the game, when Sarunas was not in a slump, where Jax REFUSED to give him the ball when he was open. jackson is more detrimental to this team than Artest was...Both have to go... wheres mikey網友: A problem maybe is that the Good ole boys club, so to speak, is alive and well with the Pacers. Nobody can deny that Jackson and Tinsley have shown some contempt for SarJas's game, and at times display it by shaking him off, not passing the ball and staring him down. This has to affect a guy's game who has been the leader of his team's past. 之前小葉的命中率還在190+的時候，怎麼不見Kravitz老師出來預測走勢? 幾場低潮就拿來說小葉的交易也soso，太過份了吧? 上季末小歐背傷時兩波連勝，之前對超音速沒小歐反而贏，那我是不是也可以說溜馬沒有小歐反而更強? 依據自己的好惡來判斷事情當然是很容易，可是老師您可是專家耶，寫出來的文章動見觀瞻耶，放放馬後砲寫些球迷意見就可以領稿費耶。 "誰來告訴我：為什麼 Jackson 被看成莽夫、毒瘤，而一樣經常發言的 Jasikevicius 被看成是有想法、熱情的領袖？" 老師這句話要說明什麼呢? Jax只因為經常發言而被看成莽夫、毒瘤? 請問各位觀眾，Jax老是被虧是因為他經常發言嗎? 是因為他不穩，情緒控制不佳，又會在場上脫序演出，不是嗎? 誰來告訴我：這跟他是否經常發言有什麼關係? 跟小葉又有什麼關係? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 然後全是誰都會說的馬後砲。 5. And Walsh? His long-term record is undeniable, impeccable（完美） even, but there have been major missteps in recent times. He re-signed Austin Croshere to a massive deal. He lost Brad Miller. He held on to Artest for far too long. He stayed with Jamaal Tinsley, who still has never reached the playoffs in one piece. He whiffed on the Jonathan Bender trade, although there were physical issues beyond anybody's control. Walsh 呢？從他接手以來，表現可以說是無可挑剔，甚至是完美，但是，最近他似乎開始踏錯腳步。他與 Austin Crosher 簽下巨額合約。他換走 Brad Miller。他挺 Artest 太久。他也欣賞從來沒有完整打完季後賽的 Jammal Tinsley。他還在 Jonathan Bender 的交易上沉思過久，即使在 Bender 的個案當中，有不可知的健康因素在影響。 Let's just say, it's been an awfully long time since the masterstroke of trading for a young, unproven Jermaine O'Neal. 這麼說好了，從找來璞玉 Jermaine O'Neal 之後，已經太久沒有什麼真正內行、厲害的作為了。 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 自從Mike Wells賣了阿泰，還大言不慚地說不必為溜馬的窘境負責，我就對IndyStar很反感了。很明顯，又是一篇譁眾取寵的Hate文；它指出一堆人所共知的問題，聲聲催促，卻完全沒有提供可行的解決之道。 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- (不好意思，我在抱怨Kravitz老師，但引用了精美的譯文，希望hsupohsiang大大不要介意。) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.73.66.57