Re: [BOX ] Cavaliers 120:113 Pacers 數據
看板PACERS (印第安那 溜馬)作者lens82801 (開始QQ的見習生)時間3年前 (2022/02/28 18:30)推噓4(4推 0噓 8→)留言12則, 5人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)
: 推 indpa5553: Smith比較尷尬,打的好我們也留不住 02/12 10:49
: 推 larson: Jalen Smith主要是看價碼吧~畢竟要論薪資空間我們是有的 02/12 11:07
: → larson: 然後就看有哪些球隊會砸錢搶他,以及Turner和Goga的去留 02/12 11:07
: 推 indpa5553: Smith因為太陽沒撿TO,母隊最高只能開到470萬的樣子, 02/12 11:13
: → indpa5553: 跟當年的S.Hill一樣 02/12 11:13
: 推 larson: @indpa5553, 470萬的限制記得是沒有薪資空間的情況下,想要 02/12 11:30
: → larson: 使用鳥權或早鳥續約時,會因為他之前簽的新人約而被限制住 02/12 11:30
: → larson: 像是當年我們溜馬跟現在的太陽一樣都是超過cap的狀態下 02/12 11:31
: → larson: 但暑假我們的薪資空間騰出來後應該就不存在這個問題了吧~ 02/12 11:32
我本來的觀念跟larson大一樣,以為只要有薪資空間就沒問題,不過後來看到推特跟
reddit都在討論這件事就去翻了Larry Coon,終於找到相關規定,發文記錄一下:
http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q47
Teams have until the October 31 preceding the player's second regular season
to exercise their option for the player's third season. Likewise, they have
until the October 31 preceding the player's third regular season to exercise
their option for the player's fourth season (see question number 57 for more
information on options). If the team invokes both options (keeping the player
for all four seasons) and submits a qualifying offer after the fourth season,
then the player becomes a restricted free agent (see question number 42 for
more information on restricted free agency). If the team declines either
option, then the player enters free agency as an unrestricted free agent.
However, if the team declines either option and the player becomes a free
agent, the team cannot re-sign him to a salary greater than he would have
received had the team exercised its option. In other words, teams can't
decline an option year in order to get around the rookie salary scale and
give the player more money. This applies to all types of signings, including
the Bird exception, the Mid-Level exception, and cap room.
上色部分是重點,只要沒有執行新秀合約第三、第四年任一個球隊選項,該球員在休賽季
成為UFA,且母隊開出的新合約不能超過原本球隊選項的價碼,以Jalen Smith的案例來看
就是4.67M。不論用何種方式簽約都受此限制,包含鳥權、中產跟薪資空間。
新合約的長度跟選項的部分沒看到詳細規定,如果有人知道相關資訊再麻煩補充一下!
Jalen Smith交易後在我們這邊打得挺不錯的,給了機會表現卻沒辦法留下來會有點可惜
,我們能給他最好的合約應該就起薪4.67M+第二年PO了。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.246.224.137 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PACERS/M.1646044215.A.8C4.html
→
02/28 19:58,
3年前
, 1F
02/28 19:58, 1F
→
02/28 19:59,
3年前
, 2F
02/28 19:59, 2F
→
02/28 20:00,
3年前
, 3F
02/28 20:00, 3F
→
02/28 20:01,
3年前
, 4F
02/28 20:01, 4F
推
02/28 20:19,
3年前
, 5F
02/28 20:19, 5F
他是有數據,不過實際看比賽還是挺raw的,我也好奇其他隊會開多少給他
推
02/28 20:25,
3年前
, 6F
02/28 20:25, 6F
→
02/28 20:25,
3年前
, 7F
02/28 20:25, 7F
下一季再觀察看看調度,以目前可用人手來看是幾乎只能擺三衛
推
02/28 22:47,
3年前
, 8F
02/28 22:47, 8F
→
02/28 22:47,
3年前
, 9F
02/28 22:47, 9F
→
02/28 22:47,
3年前
, 10F
02/28 22:47, 10F
確實很有可能選長人進來,Smith肯定會想找上場機會多的隊伍
推
02/28 23:35,
3年前
, 11F
02/28 23:35, 11F
→
02/28 23:37,
3年前
, 12F
02/28 23:37, 12F
只有限制起薪的話,應該就是這樣沒錯!
※ 編輯: lens82801 (111.246.224.228 臺灣), 03/01/2022 10:38:16
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
PACERS 近期熱門文章
63
120
41
115
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
249
397