[外電] Kobe's trade request raises big questions

看板PHX-Suns (鳳凰城 太陽)作者 (原來馬刺是韓國隊)時間19年前 (2007/06/17 07:32), 編輯推噓10(10015)
留言25則, 9人參與, 最新討論串1/1
其實這篇應該只能算是臆測 (rumor?) 原文來自 http://0rz.tw/4a2JS 我節錄一下重點, 大家看看就好....(笑笑就好?) What are some realistic trade destinations if Bryant ultimately forces a trade? The Clippers and Chicago are the only two teams that had a shot at signing Bryant away from the Lakers when he was a free agent in 2004. The Clips, naturally, are the last team that the Lakers would want to trade him to, given that they share a building as well as a city, but Bryant will have more control over his future than any other player would in this position because of that no-trade clause. "It's all up to him," said one Western Conference executive. San Antonio's Gregg Popovich and Phoenix's Mike D'Antoni are two coaches Bryant speaks fondly of, Popovich especially. The Spurs and Suns aren't much further down than the Clips on the list of teams that the Lakers would hate to deal with, true, but -- again -- Bryant's no-trade clause prevents us from ruling out the startling image of, say, Steve Nash, Raja Bell and Kobe Bryant lining up in the same small-ball unit in the desert. Especially given all the assets Phoenix could offer; one theoretical package could include Shawn Marion, Boris Diaw, Leandro Barbosa and a first-round pick or two. If the Lakers decide that they have no choice but to act on Bryant's trade demand, they'll naturally be calling Portland and Seattle to see either of those teams would be willing to assemble a package that starts with either the No. 1 (Greg Oden) or No. 2 (Kevin Durant) pick in next month's draft. Can't see Bryant being willing to relocate to the Pacific Northwest. So . . . Chicago, New York, Phoenix, San Antonio and the Clippers. That's a likely starting five, and let's throw in Philadelphia only because going to his hometown 76ers -- and winning over the fans who so famously booed him in the 2002 All-Star Game -- might have some appeal as well. OK . . . one more suggestion from NBA front-office sources: Bryant to New Jersey to play with Jason Kidd in exchange for a package headlined by a signed-and-traded Vince Carter. The Lakers' unwillingness to part with young center Andrew Bynum in a potential Kidd trade in February, you'll recall, is among the non-moves since O'Neal's departure that has Bryant so frustrated. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 24.209.57.117

06/17 08:20, , 1F
換啊!!!BELL和KOBE是不打不相識的死黨啊XD
06/17 08:20, 1F

06/18 01:53, , 2F
換他過來球大概不用流動了...有bell就夠了
06/18 01:53, 2F

06/18 11:24, , 3F
Kobe 值得這樣換???
06/18 11:24, 3F

06/18 18:56, , 4F
真這樣換太陽就收集到年度第一隊球員三名 = =
06/18 18:56, 4F

06/18 18:57, , 5F
然後他們可能要有場場打48分鐘的覺悟
06/18 18:57, 5F

06/18 20:50, , 6F
像這樣的條件 就感覺像是用潛力股去換鈔票一樣...
06/18 20:50, 6F

06/18 20:51, , 7F
barbosa+第一輪選秀權...雖然換了KOBE 但是未來的發展...
06/18 20:51, 7F

06/18 20:53, , 8F
感覺還是不太好><...畢竟barbosa這一季打得有聲有色
06/18 20:53, 8F

06/19 03:26, , 9F
但是能換KOBE是個很大的誘惑~
06/19 03:26, 9F

06/19 08:30, , 10F
Nash不是運過半場把球交給KOBE幹的控衛 在Nash幾乎掌控全
06/19 08:30, 10F

06/19 08:33, , 11F
隊進攻(包含Nash自己操刀) KOBE有可能安靜在外圍等空檔
06/19 08:33, 11F

06/19 08:38, , 12F
進攻不順的時候才自己自幹? 要是能這樣也不會交易O'Neal
06/19 08:38, 12F

06/19 11:54, , 13F
我倒是覺得如果能換KOBE來就換吧,拿不到冠軍什麼未來的
06/19 11:54, 13F

06/19 11:55, , 14F
發展都是空談,不可否認的現在少了NASH的太陽還談不上是A
06/19 11:55, 14F

06/19 11:56, , 15F
級球隊,不如把握NASH最後的黃金歲月,配Marion或Amare再搭
06/19 11:56, 15F

06/19 11:57, , 16F
上另一個球星,一舉奪冠比較實在啦,想想NASH和KOBE
06/19 11:57, 16F

06/19 11:58, , 17F
換KOBE還不如換KG
06/19 11:58, 17F

06/19 11:58, , 18F
配起來感覺威力比金塊的Double A還恐怖
06/19 11:58, 18F

06/19 11:59, , 19F
另外,我真的覺得,如果換不了球員其實換教練也是一條路啦
06/19 11:59, 19F

06/19 23:38, , 20F
換個凱一點的老板比較實在.
06/19 23:38, 20F

06/20 22:17, , 21F
打法也有差...太陽打整體流動性...很少單打
06/20 22:17, 21F

06/20 22:18, , 22F
kobe來了話...就像enm說的(KOBE等空檔投球?)薪資也是大問題
06/20 22:18, 22F

06/20 22:19, , 23F
還有...怎麼會不考慮未來發展 事情哪有這麼簡單@@
06/20 22:19, 23F

06/20 22:20, , 24F
也且KOBE來又不是說穩拿冠軍..沒拿到不就整個太陽下山了
06/20 22:20, 24F

06/20 22:21, , 25F
也沒錢再補人進來...交易 又走回頭路?0.0?
06/20 22:21, 25F
文章代碼(AID): #16T7CM9D (PHX-Suns)
文章代碼(AID): #16T7CM9D (PHX-Suns)