[外電] Phoenix Suns guard Steve Nash files …

看板PHX-Suns (鳳凰城 太陽)作者 (洪大少)時間15年前 (2010/12/23 22:11), 編輯推噓21(21029)
留言50則, 18人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://ppt.cc/KYYs Phoenix Suns guard Steve Nash files for divorce 老大的離婚文件 Steve Nash, the face of the Phoenix Suns, has filed for divorce from his wife, Alejandra, and is asking the court to uphold a premarital agreement that calls for him to not provide permanent spousal support. Nash──太陽的代表性人物──已經和他的老婆Alejandra提出離婚文件,並且 向法院提出希望可以履行婚前協議,希望獲得配偶放棄永久扶養權的支持。 fwf12 :我查了一下...Spousal support比較像是贍養費 12/24 10:01

12/24 10:02,
所以基本上Nash簽的婚前協議是不提供贍養費的意思
12/24 10:02

12/24 10:08,
然後,看了一下是雙方都將不負擔對方的生活
12/24 10:08

12/24 10:09,
但是律師先生說Nash依舊會養家(但是不以贍養名義)
12/24 10:09

12/24 10:09,
這樣應該比較清楚:)
12/24 10:09
Nash, who has made more than $100 million during his NBA career, filed divorce papers Dec. 15 in Maricopa County Superior Court. Nash在NBA的生涯中獲得1億美元以上的酬勞,12/5日, Maricopa County的法院宣判他離婚。 Profile: Steve Nash Nash的資料 Nash publicly announced Nov. 13 that he was divorcing his wife. It was the day after she gave birth to the couple's third child, a son. The couple was together about nine years, and was married June 11, 2005. They also have twin daughters who are 6. 在11/13,Nash公開宣布離婚。那一天他的妻子為他生下了第三個小孩,一個兒子。 他和他老婆交往了九年,從2005年6/11結縭至今。 也有一對6歲的雙胞胎女兒。 In the divorce filing, Nash said their marriage is "irretrievably broken" with "no reasonable prospect of reconciliation." 在離婚的聲明中,Nash的說法是他們的婚姻有「沒有理由相信會和解的不可彌補的裂痕」 In a statement issued Tuesday, Alejandra said she was surprised by her husband's decision. Alejandra在星期二發表的聲明指出,她對於Nash的決定感到震驚。 "I still do not quite understand what interests possessed Steve to do such a thing at this moment, as he told me of his desire to divorce the day before the birth of our son," she said. "I thought I knew Steve better. But no matter how trying and disappointing the situation, Steve is the father of our family. I hope whatever the future holds this process will do right by all of them." 「我還是無法明白到底是什麼致使Nash在這樣的時刻做出這樣的決定──在他告訴我 他的決定的前一天我們的兒子才剛剛出生。我以為我很了解Steve......然而無論 怎麼嘗試和失望不斷循環的處境一再發生,他仍然是這個家庭的父親。我希望不管 未來發生了什麼事,對所有人來說,這樣會是好的。」 In the divorce petition, Nash asks the court to uphold a premarital agreement signed three days before their wedding. Among other things, it says each side has waived any claim to permanent spousal maintenance. 在離婚協議中,Nash要求法庭根據他們在婚前三天所簽署的婚前協議執行相關事項。 除此之外,協議規定雙方都應該放棄聲稱對孩子擁有終生的撫養權。 Steven Wolfson, an attorney for Steve Nash, said he could not discuss details of the filing. But he said Nash would provide for his wife and children. 律師Steven Wolfson說,他不能透露關於這件案子的細節。 但是Nash會保護他的妻兒。 "Both she and the children will be provided for, there is no issue along those lines at all," Wolfson said. "We are very hopeful that he and his wife and the children's privacy can be respected as they work through this." Wolfson說: 「她和孩子們會被保護於,在這個案件中沒有任何其他的問題。 我們也很希望當他們處理這件事情時,他和妻兒的隱私可以被尊重。」 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 180.218.196.150

12/23 22:13, , 1F
這篇翻得好難過喔。
12/23 22:13, 1F
bll135:轉錄至看板 SteveNash13 12/23 22:13

12/23 22:13, , 2F
唉 /pat
12/23 22:13, 2F
※ 編輯: bll135 來自: 180.218.196.150 (12/23 22:17)

12/23 22:18, , 3F
所以到底是為啥要離婚?
12/23 22:18, 3F

12/23 22:19, , 4F
沒講。應該跟聚少離多脫不了關係吧我想......
12/23 22:19, 4F

12/23 22:22, , 5F
真是越來越不懂老大了~"~
12/23 22:22, 5F

12/23 22:23, , 6F
I thought I knew Steve better是說我以為我更了解他
12/23 22:23, 6F

12/23 22:23, , 7F
謝謝...
12/23 22:23, 7F

12/23 22:24, , 8F
很了解他啦 恍神= ="
12/23 22:24, 8F
其實差不多阿XD ※ 編輯: bll135 來自: 180.218.196.150 (12/23 22:24)

12/23 22:25, , 9F
因為我想說更了解他講起來好像很奇怪的感覺XD"
12/23 22:25, 9F

12/23 22:25, , 10F
噢噢這樣說好像也是.....
12/23 22:25, 10F

12/23 22:27, , 11F
其實我一直搞不懂permanent spousal maintenance的意
12/23 22:27, 11F

12/23 22:28, , 12F
思 我昨天在看的時候就一直在想= = 有專業人士嗎XD
12/23 22:28, 12F

12/23 22:41, , 13F
是老大提出離婚的@_@|| 我好驚訝喔Orz
12/23 22:41, 13F

12/23 22:42, , 14F
家務事看看就好
12/23 22:42, 14F

12/23 22:43, , 15F
我一直以為他是很愛家的= =...
12/23 22:43, 15F

12/23 22:45, , 16F
不見得是不愛家,也許他有他的苦衷......
12/23 22:45, 16F

12/23 22:46, , 17F
詭異的時間點然後他現在感覺還是過得很爽 整人新招?
12/23 22:46, 17F

12/23 22:48, , 18F
算了= =我在激動啥= =
12/23 22:48, 18F

12/23 22:48, , 19F
對阿 你在激動啥XD
12/23 22:48, 19F

12/23 22:57, , 20F
想不到我跟Nash的愛情觀這麼類似...
12/23 22:57, 20F

12/23 22:58, , 21F
離婚沒必要那麼嚴肅拉 婚姻是一輩子的 不能勉強
12/23 22:58, 21F

12/23 22:58, , 22F
有時候愛 但是也是有別的原因要分開
12/23 22:58, 22F

12/23 22:58, , 23F
樓上還沒結婚?
12/23 22:58, 23F

12/23 22:58, , 24F
=口="
12/23 22:58, 24F

12/23 23:01, , 25F
還沒阿 不過我看過不少親戚不合還硬要勉強的一起
12/23 23:01, 25F

12/23 23:01, , 26F
abc應該是問小帥哥吧=口=
12/23 23:01, 26F

12/23 23:03, , 27F
是 不過問你也是一樣的XD
12/23 23:03, 27F

12/23 23:04, , 28F
我看我們開個婚姻輔導置底好了XD
12/23 23:04, 28F

12/23 23:08, , 29F
男女板歡迎你XD
12/23 23:08, 29F

12/23 23:08, , 30F
XD
12/23 23:08, 30F

12/23 23:10, , 31F
其實我是覺得在這麼敏感的時機提離婚真的很弔詭..
12/23 23:10, 31F

12/23 23:24, , 32F
這...可惜了...完美男人的身份出現了一些裂痕〒△〒
12/23 23:24, 32F

12/23 23:25, , 33F
不能再同意樓上更多ˊˋ
12/23 23:25, 33F

12/23 23:41, , 34F
總覺得跟第三個小孩有關(綠帽?)... 純猜測
12/23 23:41, 34F

12/23 23:46, , 35F
樓上~我看完整篇之後也跟你有同樣想法!!!!!
12/23 23:46, 35F

12/23 23:47, , 36F
看到生孩子那行馬上聯想到樓樓上的理由...
12/23 23:47, 36F

12/23 23:55, , 37F
想法歸想法 還滿難過的 沒憑沒據所以別延伸下去了
12/23 23:55, 37F

12/23 23:58, , 38F
嗯.....
12/23 23:58, 38F

12/23 23:59, , 39F
想太多了= =......
12/23 23:59, 39F

12/24 00:19, , 40F
感謝翻譯,辛苦了。
12/24 00:19, 40F

12/24 01:58, , 41F
推翻譯
12/24 01:58, 41F

12/24 02:02, , 42F
唉可是好囉喔...
12/24 02:02, 42F

12/24 05:08, , 43F
Nash這一年來真是苦了他了 場上場外 唉
12/24 05:08, 43F

12/24 10:01, , 44F
我查了一下...Spousal support比較像是贍養費
12/24 10:01, 44F

12/24 10:02, , 45F
所以基本上Nash簽的婚前協議是不提供贍養費的意思
12/24 10:02, 45F

12/24 10:07, , 46F
所以這樣可以跟司機結婚了嗎???????????
12/24 10:07, 46F

12/24 10:08, , 47F
然後,看了一下是雙方都將不負擔對方的生活
12/24 10:08, 47F

12/24 10:09, , 48F
但是律師先生說Nash依舊會養家(但是不以贍養名義)
12/24 10:09, 48F

12/24 10:09, , 49F
這樣應該比較清楚:)
12/24 10:09, 49F

12/24 17:27, , 50F
謝謝,原來我翻錯了>///<
12/24 17:27, 50F
※ 編輯: bll135 來自: 180.218.196.150 (12/24 17:27)
文章代碼(AID): #1D4rYHQz (PHX-Suns)
文章代碼(AID): #1D4rYHQz (PHX-Suns)