[外電] 太陽季後球員分析 Hakim Warrick

看板PHX-Suns (鳳凰城太陽)作者sandwalk (sandwalker)時間14年前 (2012/05/29 01:12)推噓6(6推 0噓 2→)

留言8則, 6人參與討論串1/1

文章來源: http://ppt.cc/wU!, Here at Bright Side of the Sun we take the words TOTAL COVERAGE pretty dang seriously. While our beloved Suns are off taking nice vacations, we are still slaving away, attempting to provide you all with first class Suns coverage. So friends, without further adieu, we present you with the Phoenix Suns Season in Review, 2011-12. Up for discussion today is Hakim Warrick. 在「太陽光明面」站上,我們非常厭惡「概括」這個詞. 當我們所愛的太陽在享受美妙假期時, 我們仍像被努力帶來一流的太陽評論. 朋友們, 在道別前, 我們將繼續呈現上太陽隊11-12球季的總評. 今天討論的是Hakim Warrick Hakim Warrick was in a heated battle this season. Not a heated battle for playing time, a heated battle to win the inaugural Taylor Griffin Least Valuable Player Award. As part of this spellbinding analysis I will ask you to not only consider what grade you would give Warrick for the season, but also whether he was actually the least valuable player on the team. He had some stiff competition. I think you all know who I’m talking about. 瓦力本季處於一場激烈的競賽. 不是爭上場時間, 而是比誰會贏得最沒有價值球員.作為 (引人入勝的)本文分析的一部分, 我請你們先不要對瓦力評分,也先忽略他是隊上最沒有價值球員的事實. 關於這點, 我想大家都已知道, 他還有一些競爭對手. The report card I’m about to hand out won’t be pretty. I don’t necessarily subscribe to the "No Sun Left Behind" ideal. There appears to be one thing that Warrick excels at (dunking) and very little else that he does at an even average level. There were fugacious moments where Warrick did make contributions, but they were few and far between. 以下這份我準備交出的報告並不漂亮.我並沒有想描繪出“不丟下任何一個太陽隊員”這樣的理想.這些數據顯示瓦力只擅長一件事(灌籃), 而其他的只有很小一部分他可以達到平均水準. 瓦力有短暫的時期確實有作出貢獻, 但偏偏這樣的時候很少. As a very clever person put it, Warrick is like a $1 scratcher lottery ticket. You’re not investing much, and you don’t expect much in return. Every once in a while you win $5 and are pleasantly surprised, but the next 9 times you scratch it off and get nothing (or at best your dollar back). If you’re feeling lucky, scratch ahead and keep your fingers crossed. 就像一個聰明人會形容的,瓦力像是一張只值1美元的刮刮樂彩券. 你並沒有投資很多,也沒有指望回收. 你可能有一次很驚喜的贏了5美元,但接下來的九次你甚麼都刮不出來.如果你正覺得運氣不錯, 那就雙手合十祈禱後, 繼續刮下去吧. Here are Warrick’s numbers as a Sun. Season Age Tm Lg G GS MP FG FGA 10-11 28 PHO NBA 80 6 17.7 2.9 5.6 11-12 29 PHO NBA 35 0 14.4 2.1 5.1 Career NBA 498 94 20.4 3.4 7 Season FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB 10-11 0.511 0 0.1 0.091 2.7 3.7 0.721 1.1 11-12 0.411 0 0.3 0.1 2.2 2.8 0.768 0.9 Career 0.494 0 0.2 0.196 2.6 3.6 0.728 1.3 Season DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS 10-11 2.6 3.7 0.9 0.4 0.1 1 1.3 8.4 11-12 1.7 2.6 0.9 0.2 0.1 1 1 6.4 Career 2.7 4.1 0.8 0.4 0.3 1.2 1.9 9.5 Provided by Basketball-Reference.com: View Original Table Generated 5/17/2012. There is a pretty conspicuous decline here. His points, rebounds, and minutes per game were the lowest since his rookie season. Field goal percentage – career low (and a drop of 10%!). Advanced numbers reveal the same conclusion. This was Hakim Warrick’s worst year statistically since his rookie season. Considering that was his rookie season this may very well have been his worst year as a pro. 這些數據呈現相當明顯的下降.他的平均得分,籃板,上場分鐘都是他的新秀賽季以來的最低.投籃命中率則是職業新低(足足下降了10％!).更深入的數據顯示了同樣的結論. 這是瓦力自他的菜鳥球季以來數據最差的一年. 如果考慮對菜鳥球季不應該預期甚麼,那今年很可能是他目前職業生涯中最差的一年. What I think is a telling stat is that Warrick’s career ORtg/DRtg are 109/110, but this year they were 100/109. Warrick still played the consistently poor defense that has plagued him his whole career, but this year failed to provide an offensive spark to offset this deficiency. 我想最具代表性的數據是瓦力生涯的進攻效率/防守效率值(ORtg/DRtg)是109/110, 今年則是100/109. 瓦力今年的表現仍是如困擾他整個職業生涯的一貫防守不佳, 但今年還未能提供進攻上的火花, 以彌補這方面的不足. Now let’s look at something else that is rather condemning: 現在讓我們譴責先看看別的數字: TOP INDIVIDUAL PLAYERS PLAYER TEAM + - +/- +/- /MIN S. Nash Suns 4,205 -4,028 177 1961:06 C. Frye Suns 3,564 -3,397 167 1669:25 G. Hill Suns 2,895 -2,786 109 1377:41 M. Gortat Suns 4,433 -4,345 88 2114:00 J. Dudley Suns 4,242 -4,155 87 2019:52 R. Price Suns 986 -1,029 -43 517:04 R. Lopez Suns 1,730 -1,791 -61 894:40 J. Childress Suns 953 -1,015 -62 491:27 M. Morris Suns 2,407 -2,480 -73 1226:59 S. Brown Suns 2,819 -2,894 -75 1399:54 M. Redd Suns 1,523 -1,644 -121 770:07 H. Warrick Suns 936 -1,062 -126 503:01 S. Telfair Suns 1,692 -1,839 -147 894:39 As depicted, Warrick was second to worst in +/-. Steve Nash (big surprise) was #1. However, by manipulating the numbers to militate the interpretation and using an adjusted +/- per minutes played, Warrick ranks dead last at -1 point per 3.99 minutes played. With Nash at +1 point per 11.08 minutes played, if Warrick played 12 minutes in a game it would basically take Nash 33 minutes to undo the damage he caused. Surprisingly (or not), Channing Frye ranks #1 on the team in +/- per minutes played at +1 point per 10 minutes played. 如同所列出來的, 瓦力的正負值(+/-)是隊上倒數第二,而老大則是(出人意料)排名第一. 然而, 如果要調整這些數據來改變解釋方法, 而改採按上場時間平均後的正負值後,瓦力的排名就變成墊底,每上場3.99時間太陽就輸對手1分. 對比於老大每上場11.08分鐘能使太陽贏對手1分, 如果瓦力上場12分鐘, 老大必須留在場上33分鐘才能追回瓦力所丟的分數.令人(不)驚訝的是, 福來在正負值上排名第一 - 每上場10分鐘可以幫太陽贏對手1分. Warrick narrowly edged out Josh Childress to avoid having the least number of games played this season. In fact, the three Suns at the end of the bench appeared in 34 (Childress), 35 (Warrick), and 36 (Price – who actually started 8) respectively. All three of these players showed flickers of promise, but all three failed to earn regular playing time and found themselves completely out of the rotation for stretches of the season. 瓦力以微弱差距贏了童裝而不是本季出賽數最少的太陽球員. 事實上,三個在板凳末端的太陽球員出賽數剛好分別是34(童裝), 35(瓦力), 36(真王牌,在季初則先發了八場). 這三個球員曾都有過機會,但都沒能獲得足夠的上場時間而最後發現自己完全被排除在本季的輪替之外. Warrick was thrust back into a larger role again at the end of the season after a devastating injury to Channing Frye left the Suns scrambling for frontcourt help. Warrick actually played more minutes in the last 3 games (66) than he had in the previous 21 (62). To his credit, Warrick appeared ready to play and there were even brief glimpses where it appeared he was helping the team, but those were ephemeral, and Warrick the defensive sieve rematerialized as he did throughout the season. 瓦力在季末福來受傷後因鋒線需要被再次賦予了較重要的角色.瓦力在最後3場比賽(66分鐘)比他前21場(62分鐘)上場的時間還長. 可幫他記上一筆的是, 瓦力當時似乎馬上作好了上場的準備, 在那段時間裡他看似幫助了球隊, 然而這只是短暫的, 瓦力的破爛防守馬上又一如以往的回來了. After playing in 80 of 82 games during the 2010-11 season, it seems that Warrick has fallen out of favor/played himself out of a position and that two years into his contract this experiment appears to be an utter failure. I find it highly improbable that Warrick will find himself in a consistent role where he’s helping the team and contributing next season. 在2010-11賽季中打了82場比賽的80場後之後, 瓦力似乎已經失寵也找不到可以發揮的位置,從他合約的頭兩年來看, 簽下他的這個實驗似乎是一個徹底的失敗. 我覺得瓦力下季能找到自己定位並對球隊作出貢獻的可能性非常低. The Suns should attempt to move Warrick, if possible, even if for nothing more than the sake of opening up a roster spot for somebody who might be able to contribute more next season. 如果可能的話,太陽應該嘗試交易瓦力, 即使是僅僅為了清出一個名額給其他可能在下季能作出更大的貢獻的球員. I give Warrick a D- for his lack of performance. 因為他的(缺乏)表現, 我給瓦力D-. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 119.127.158.196