[情報] Playoff sneak peek

看板Spurs (聖安東尼奧 馬刺)作者 (keepstudying)時間18年前 (2007/04/08 15:29), 編輯推噓4(402)
留言6則, 5人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
拍謝~因為沒太多時間能夠翻譯 可能會讓各位暫時用英文閱讀一下了~ Yahoo Sport的Steve Kerr這篇文章有點出馬刺太陽之間的對決可能問題 重點部分會用黃色特別標示 建議不瞭解為什麼馬刺總能夠在馬刺太陽對決中佔有優勢的版友 可以把我用黃色標示的文字稍微閱讀一下~ http://0rz.tw/6b2zY Playoff sneak peek By Steve Kerr, Yahoo! Sports SAN ANTONIO – The matchup appears inevitable, complete with all its nuances: the total contrast in styles, Steve Nash's brilliance against Tony Parker's speed, the methodical dominance of Tim Duncan against the explosive youth of Amare Stoudemire and Gregg Popovich's defensive obsession against Mike D'Antoni's need for high-scoring, frenetic basketball. It's all there, and in all likelihood we're going to see it live and in color in a best-of-seven series sometime in May. On Thursday night we got a sneak preview of that potential playoff matchup, and if the San Antonio Spurs' 92-85 win over the Phoenix Suns proved anything, it's that San Antonio might be the only team in the NBA that can slow the Suns down. The two clubs are locked in as the No. 2 and No. 3 seeds in the Western Conference, so barring a major first-round upset, they will meet in the West semifinals. Phoenix's main focus in the final two weeks of the season is securing the two spot, which carries with it the home-court advantage in an eventual series with the Spurs. But San Antonio kept that race alive with Thursday's win and is now within range of the Suns, sitting just two games back and owning the tiebreaker in case the teams are even in the standings. With seven games remaining, Phoenix doesn't have much breathing room trying to secure that second seed. Of more concern for the Suns, though, is the manner in which the Spurs controlled the tempo Thursday night. For most of the game, Phoenix's vaunted running attack was held in check. San Antonio used its execution in the half court to slow things down, accomplishing that task by taking care of the ball and establishing Tim Duncan in the post. Tony Parker attacked when he had an advantage and got plenty of easy hoops in scoring a season-high 35 points, but in the half court, the Spurs opted not to launch quick jump shots that might result in rebounds and fast breaks. Instead, they went to Duncan, who had his way with Stoudemire and Boris Diaw. Unable to deal with Duncan by using smaller defenders, the Suns were forced to counter with Kurt Thomas. While Thomas did a great job defensively on Duncan, his presence meant Phoenix couldn't go with its small, quick lineup to expose matchups and quicken the pace. The result was a tempo that San Antonio was very comfortable with. Therein lies the rub for the Suns: If they go small, they can't guard Duncan. If they put Thomas in the game, they can't run. That's why the Spurs have been the one NBA team capable of slowing down Phoenix the past couple of years. And by keeping the Suns in the half court, San Antonio has been able to deny them open looks at three-pointers. Much of Phoenix's success in recent years has come from its firepower from the three-point line. Against the rest of the league the last three seasons, the Suns have averaged 25 three-point attempts, making about 10 per game. Against San Antonio, those numbers are down considerably – 16 three-point attempts and fewer than six made per game (they made just two of 11 Thursday). Without a big three-point advantage or many open-court opportunities, Phoenix has been unable to play its customary relentless style against the Spurs. That's why San Antonio has now won 15 of the last 19 meetings between the two clubs, including the playoffs. With all that said, and with the Suns shooting a mere 38.6 percent Thursday night, Phoenix was still within four points at 84-80 late in the game. The Spurs needed to make a couple of big stops late to secure the victory. If you're the Suns, you walk away thinking, "Wow, we played horribly and we had a chance to win." But the reality is, if San Antonio plays its style and doesn't allow Phoenix to shoot threes or get out in transition over an entire seven-game series, the Spurs are going to win. That's their style – it's what they do. For the Suns to beat San Antonio, Amare Stoudemire has to be able to defend Duncan. Thomas will be counted on during certain possessions, but if Stoudemire can hold his own defensively and stay on the floor, Phoenix is more likely to play the game at its pace. The Suns can slide Shawn Marion to the four, put three guards on the court and try to run and shoot like crazy. And with the Spurs so focused on staying home with three-point shooters, Stoudemire can use the open space in the lane to attack the rim. That's what he did in the teams' 2005 West finals series – won 4-1 by San Antonio – when he averaged 37 points a game. Thursday was a different story, however. Stoudemire scored only 15 points on 7-of-19 shooting, and he was never a factor. This game was a barometer of sorts for each club, and the Spurs liked what they saw. Phoenix, on the other hand, found out it is going to have to make some adjustments if it's going to beat San Antonio. The first order of business is to try to secure the two seed and the home-court advantage. But if this matchup occurs in May, the Suns will have to figure out how to play their game – not San Antonio's. *********************************************************************** 簡單講就是太陽引以為傲的三分被馬刺捏死了 打不出三分~又被Duncan持續得分 逼得太陽不得不將Kurt Thomas放上場 但一放Thomas上場~整個比賽節奏就不是太陽隊喜愛的節奏了 反而是馬刺隊喜愛的節奏 當然會有人對於Duncan似乎無法完全防守住Stoudemire這點提出疑問 只是~內線強攻的方式似乎不是太陽能夠取得勝利的方式 本文倒數第二段有寫到這個論點 Stoudemire內線強攻可能的原因是 馬刺寧可放你內線,也不願放棄對外線三分的緊守 所以在2005年西區季後賽碰頭時~Stoudemire五場平均得分為37分 但馬刺卻是以4-1帶走勝利 這篇文章不錯看~建議版友慢慢閱讀~ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.120.102.46 ※ 編輯: keepstudying 來自: 140.120.102.46 (04/08 15:31)

04/08 16:46, , 1F
搖想當年馬刺第二次奪冠時對上湖人也是放大歐 不放外線ꤠ
04/08 16:46, 1F

04/08 17:32, , 2F
推一個
04/08 17:32, 2F

04/08 22:41, , 3F
可是太陽在之前的比賽輸掉後因該會改變對上馬刺時的戰術
04/08 22:41, 3F

04/08 22:42, , 4F
萬一在季後賽碰頭還是要小心點 畢竟太陽得分能力太強
04/08 22:42, 4F

04/09 01:39, , 5F
推原PO的用心~~
04/09 01:39, 5F

04/09 18:21, , 6F
只能說馬刺的外圍輪轉防守真的做的很完美
04/09 18:21, 6F
文章代碼(AID): #1669dNYC (Spurs)
文章代碼(AID): #1669dNYC (Spurs)