[討論] 筆戰:RUSS是個好控衛嗎？

看板Thunder (奧克拉荷馬市雷霆)作者tanaka0826 (田中鬪莉王)時間13年前 (2012/03/21 01:49)推噓2(2推 0噓 6→)

留言8則, 3人參與討論串1/1

Spurs @ Thunder: Why Russell Westbrook Is Not A Point Guard http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=G0_CeUzud_g

影片講得蠻清楚的，建議大家看看 http://0rz.tw/mh1uu (文章) 以上是Coach Nick利用對戰馬刺的片段來作為證明，論述RUSS的表現有多麼糟糕。進攻方面主要是批評進攻選擇，例如進攻時間還很充裕時出手，造成雷霆沒有機會搶進攻籃板；或是選擇在困難的情況下自幹，而不是傳給有檔拆機會的Harden-Collison。防守方面則是他常常放掉自己的人，造成防守大亂，或是常常在半路上跟裁判碎碎念，造成4打5的局面...。最終還批評RUSS根本不是PG，甚至斷言如果讓他繼續打PG，雷霆將永遠無法拿冠軍。 (所以要換成Reggie或是Maynor來打) ---- 當然也有人不支持Coach Nick的觀點。 Zorgon http://0rz.tw/e7lJh 大推這篇裡面也有許多圖，對於Coach的論點一一反擊 --- Royce Young在推特上也回應了Coach https://twitter.com/#!/bballSource/status/182109170001117184 bballSource Thanks,Royce!What do u not agree with? RT @dailythunder: Don't agree w/ all, interesting points critiquing Westbrook: Royce Young @bballSource Russ takes bad shots for sure, but so do lots of guys. Those pull-up 15 footers have become pretty important to OKC's offense. bballSource @dailythunder Bad shots are magnified when it's the PG taking them w/o ever passing it first Royce Young @bballSource I think it's more of a stylistic complaint though. Because when CP3 does it, nobody complains. bballSource @dailythunder Iit's situational too.Pull ups w/o passing in 2nd qrtr of a tie game vs down 6 w/ 5 mins to go. Not sure Russ understands this ==== 兩邊的論述都蠻有趣的，一定要看看。大家覺得勒？ -- "HARD WORK BEATS TALENT WHEN TALENT FAILS TO WORK HARD." -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.114.209.10 ※ 編輯: tanaka0826 來自: 140.114.209.10 (03/21 02:16)