Re: [灌水] 交易 要不要

看板Timberwolves (明尼蘇達 灰狼)作者 (KG4MVP)時間17年前 (2008/05/29 11:38), 編輯推噓8(806)
留言14則, 8人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
基本上需求不符,無可能性....... 貼這篇的最主要用意,為何交易一定要找Boston咧? 當Boston的NBDL也不是這樣吧! 一個狼迷提的.... http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=793486 McCants for Perkins? It would have to be after Perk's BYC status expires and I think MN would have to add filler (Madsen or Buckner). Boston gets the more talented player and a long-term replacement at SG. McCants scored 15 a game (41% 3P%) off the bench for MN last season in under 30 mpg. Boston replaces Perk by grabbing a big with the #30 pick this year. MN fills a big need and brings one of Jefferson's buddies to MN to play with Big Al. Perk might never be more than an 8 and 8 guy, but as I said he does fill a need, and the fact is you cannot expect to get equal talent when trading small for big. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.126.41.249

05/29 11:47, , 1F
看完今天比賽 C's球迷 一定一致反對
05/29 11:47, 1F

05/29 13:10, , 2F
我也不希望,McCants的成長性比Perkins好多了,Perkins在KG
05/29 13:10, 2F

05/29 13:10, , 3F
的吸引下,能夠有更多的發揮空間,但傳球並不是Al的長處
05/29 13:10, 3F

05/29 13:43, , 4F
Perkins沒有KG可能就是一個普通的C 這樣換對兩隊都沒好
05/29 13:43, 4F

05/29 13:43, , 5F
05/29 13:43, 5F

05/29 14:03, , 6F
McCants的防守會把塞隊嚇跑吧XD 我覺得只有灰狼不放棄他
05/29 14:03, 6F

05/29 14:03, , 7F
他自己也拼命才有機會出頭了。
05/29 14:03, 7F

05/29 14:09, , 8F
明年真的...不要再從先發掉到替補了
05/29 14:09, 8F

05/29 22:24, , 9F
他先發 剩下的替補更慘吧
05/29 22:24, 9F

05/30 01:09, , 10F
celtics噓要內線和替補..
05/30 01:09, 10F

05/30 14:59, , 11F
誰管你celts需要殺小......
05/30 14:59, 11F

05/31 07:56, , 12F
看到樓上我笑了XD 應該很多人也都是狼板跟塞爾提克板兩邊跑
05/31 07:56, 12F

05/31 07:56, , 13F
不過以灰狼的角度 的確誰管你需要殺小XD
05/31 07:56, 13F

05/31 08:00, , 14F
而且灰狼幫Celtics已經很多了...
05/31 08:00, 14F
文章代碼(AID): #18FYKkS9 (Timberwolves)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #18FYKkS9 (Timberwolves)