[外電] Luke Babbit

看板Timberwolves (明尼蘇達 灰狼)作者 (boooooom)時間15年前 (2010/06/01 20:34), 編輯推噓27(27010)
留言37則, 11人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
原文: http://dunkingwithwolves.com/2010/05/28/timberwolves-need-luke-babbitt-at-no-16/ >All the chatter has been about package some kind of deal with Sixers to get >the second overall pick in the draft. >And while I am all about speculation of bringing good players – minus the >bad contracts – >good players will be available if the Wolves decide to keep the 16th and >23rd picks. 目前狼迷的焦點都在於如何換來七六人手上的第二順位。 但如果我們可以留住16順位跟23順位的選秀權的話,也可以補到些不錯的新秀 >Depending on which mock draft you read or which web site you follow, >you can come-up with a variety of picks that will end-up with the Wolves. >But if Luke Babbit is still available when Minnesota has to make a selection >with the 16 pick, >the Wolves should jump at the chance to get him. >With the 16th Pick, The Timberwolves select Luke Babbitt 現在各家的Mock Draft對於灰狼的選秀差異很大,但如果Luke Babbit在十六順位還沒被 選走的話,我們要抓住這機會把他拿下來。 >The 6′9〃 lefty-sophomore averaged 21.9 ppg, 8.9 rpg and shot, >50% from the floor, 42% from the three-point range, and 92% from the foul >line. >He has the ability to score from the post and perimeter, has a good motor, >and basketball savvy rarely seen in rookies. Luke Babbit,六尺九吋的左撇子二年級生,平均21.9分 8.9籃板 , 50%的命中率、42%三分球命中率、92%罰球命中率 他有能力在禁區跟外線取分、機動性優越、良好的比賽解讀能力 >The biggest knock on Babbitt is his size and perceived lack of athletic >ability and that he is somewhere between SF and PF. >Size and “stereo-types” really don’t matter anymore in the NBA, if you >can play – you can play. 目前Luke Babbit最大的問題是:以他的Size跟體能條件,有能力在NBA打SF&PF嗎? >For as skilled as Babbitt is, he is just athletic. >Babbit has a 37.5 vertical which puts on par with UConn’s Stanley Robinson, >a half-inch better than Wesley Johnson, >two inches better than Derrick Favors, >three inches than Turner and ten inches better than DeMarcus Cousins. >Babbitt bench-pressed 185 lbs. 15 times. >Greg Monroe did the same, Derrick Favors and Oklahoma’s Tiny Gallon did one >rep less, >Cole Aldrich did five less, and Cousins didn’t even make an attempt. >This is what ESPN’s Chad Ford wrote on Babbitt; >Luke Babbitt was really helped here. A 37.5-inch vertical, >a 3.2-second sprint and an impressive 10.98 lane agility score blew away a >few GMs I spoke with. >The thinking was that he had poor lateral quickness. >I have no clue what they do to determine “lane agility” but compared to >John Wall’s 10.8, >Babbitt did well. The spirit is a 3/4 court run and Wall scored 3.2. 但Luke Babbit的體測結果讓批評者啞口無言。 垂直起跳37.5吋,勝過Wesley Johnson、Derrick Favors、Turner、DeMarcus Cousins等 以體能著稱的新秀。 185磅的推舉做了15下,勝過Greg Monroe、Derrick Favors、Cole Aldrich、DeMarcus Cousins等內線球員。 跑步的成績,跟John Wall平分秋色。 (他的體能條件真是令人流口水) >Babbitt would be able to come in and contribute right away with his shooting >and basketball I.Q. >– most over-used term when evaluating a prospect along with “tremendous >upside”. >It may take him a few seasons to add strength, but he has a skill at a size >that makes him tough to guard. Luke Babbit的籃球智商跟外線能力讓他可以立刻為球隊做出貢獻,同時擁有極大的潛力 。 他或許還需要花上幾年來增進他的力量,但他的技巧跟身材會讓防守者非常頭痛。 (不知道他防守如何?) >My fear is that Babbitt will get drafted around the 9-12 range. 現在只擔心,Luke Babbit會在9-12順位先被選走。 (這樣看下來,Luke Babbit沒道理會掉到16順位阿!聽說阿爵跟公牛都對他有興趣) >Other options at No. 16: 十六順位的其他選擇: Xavier Henry(擁有很好的體能條件,但是卻沒有發揮出來) James Anderson(看介紹感覺很像Ellington) Paul George(讚! 跟Luke Babbit一樣擁有很多Upside) Eric Bledsoe(不熟) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 58.115.142.113

06/01 20:44, , 1F
推,Paul George感覺很威:)
06/01 20:44, 1F

06/01 20:44, , 2F

06/01 20:56, , 3F
完全就是99年的Szcserbiak!
06/01 20:56, 3F

06/01 21:00, , 4F
Szcserbiak活動力有他好嗎?外線不錯動作確實也有帥哥的感覺
06/01 21:00, 4F

06/01 21:00, , 5F
他的防守很讓人擔心...nbadraft的報告懷疑他是否守得住任何
06/01 21:00, 5F

06/01 21:00, , 6F
一個現役NBA小前鋒....另外Chad Ford目前的三版預測都是
06/01 21:00, 6F

06/01 21:01, , 7F
傳球視野也算不錯,是可以考慮的對象。不過我對Paul George
06/01 21:01, 7F

06/01 21:01, , 8F
用#12選他,不過他目前聲勢看漲,灰熊可不一定選的到
06/01 21:01, 8F

06/01 21:01, , 9F
更感興趣。
06/01 21:01, 9F

06/01 21:02, , 10F
Luke Babbitt的對抗性影片看不太到
06/01 21:02, 10F

06/01 21:03, , 11F
帥哥可以打到SG,不過我感覺Luke Babbitt比較會是SF/PF
06/01 21:03, 11F

06/01 21:03, , 12F
當然看起來他是可以打到SF,有點麥克米的感覺
06/01 21:03, 12F

06/01 21:04, , 13F

06/01 21:04, , 14F
06/01 21:04, 14F

06/01 22:55, , 15F
推薦Paul George +1......很有想像空間的新秀
06/01 22:55, 15F

06/01 23:11, , 16F
借轉哭哭龍版 感恩!!
06/01 23:11, 16F

06/02 01:32, , 17F
P.G現在疑慮不都是投籃選擇 我覺得Babbit臉真的是亂殺氣一把
06/02 01:32, 17F

06/02 01:33, , 18F
這2個都有機會不3不4 其實今年除了禁區 不3不4應該是最多貨
06/02 01:33, 18F

06/02 07:46, , 19F
白色+高IQ+射手,溜馬迷看到怎麼覺得很抖....
06/02 07:46, 19F

06/02 09:10, , 20F
Luke Babbitt跟Paul George從以片看起來打SF應該是沒都沒問
06/02 09:10, 20F

06/02 09:11, , 21F
題,不會有不三不四的尷尬。兩個人機動性都不錯,不過對抗性
06/02 09:11, 21F

06/02 09:12, , 22F
George還是比較好,Babbitt都選擇即停跳投閃躲身體對抗,
06/02 09:12, 22F

06/02 09:12, , 23F
George比較多運球往籃下打的動作。
06/02 09:12, 23F

06/02 09:13, , 24F
投籃的感覺Babbitt比較殺,George的動作不是很順暢,略有怪
06/02 09:13, 24F

06/02 09:14, , 25F
異,手腕吃很多,手肘的運用很少,Babbitt真的就是很 "遛馬"
06/02 09:14, 25F

06/02 09:15, , 26F
防守端,George火鍋感覺滿會蓋的,但實際防守都沒看過不評論
06/02 09:15, 26F

06/02 10:41, , 27F
Babbitt的評比我好像也有看過Dunleavy的 還有Mullin
06/02 10:41, 27F

06/02 10:45, , 28F
白色+高IQ+射手....不就是溜馬現在的GM嗎 XD
06/02 10:45, 28F

06/02 10:46, , 29F
史上也就他有那個IQ吧XD
06/02 10:46, 29F

06/02 10:47, , 30F
雖然顯然那IQ是球員限定.........
06/02 10:47, 30F

06/02 12:14, , 31F
我怎麼覺得變成湖人板凳最末端那隻機會比較大....
06/02 12:14, 31F

06/02 12:28, , 32F
Babbitt和當年體能勁爆的台灣人亞歷山大比呢??
06/02 12:28, 32F

06/02 12:28, , 33F
是有外線的亞歷山大嗎??
06/02 12:28, 33F

06/02 12:34, , 34F
不過這隻Babbitt和Hayward比我會選Hayward
06/02 12:34, 34F

06/06 09:20, , 35F
X.Henry以他的打法 體能再好也用不上
06/06 09:20, 35F

06/06 09:21, , 36F
Alexander當年大學比Babbit沒差到哪去 而且聯盟競爭力更強
06/06 09:21, 36F

06/06 09:22, , 37F
成績純度更好
06/06 09:22, 37F
文章代碼(AID): #1C1FvkFD (Timberwolves)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1C1FvkFD (Timberwolves)