[情報] The Irrevalance of MLB Antitrust Exemption

看板BaseballSYS作者 (一名之立 旬月踟躕)時間17年前 (2007/09/08 00:03), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Mitchell J. Nathanson, "The Irrelevance of Major League Baseball's Antitrust Exemption: A Historical Review," Rutgers Law Review 58:1, 1-43(2005), available at: http://works.bepress.com/mitchell_nathanson/3 . == [Abstract] Intro. I. The Origin and Scope of Baseball's Antitrust Exemption II. The Irrelevance of Baseball's Antitrust Exemption in the Continuaition and Ultimate Abolishment of the Reserve Clause A. The Historical Development of the Reserve Clause B. The Lords' Policy of Misinformation C. The Creation of The MLBPA and the Dismantling of the Reserve Clause By Way of Contract Law III. The Irrelevance of the Exemption with Regard to Franchise Relocation and Expansion A. Franchise Relocation Pursuant to the Sherman Act: The NFL and Raiders I B. MLB Franchise Relocation and Expansion under the Exemption: A Difference Without a Distinction 1. The First Wave of Relocation: The Braves, Browns and Athletics - 1953-55 a. Congressional Intervention through the House Monopoly Subcommittee and the Lingering effects of the PCL's Attempted Merger b. Appeasement of Congress through the Relocation of the Braves and Browns c. The Relocation of the Athletics 2. Congressional Intervention and the First Wave of MLB Expansion – 1961-62 3. The Proposed Relocation of the Giants and Expansion into Tampa Bay – 1992-95 Conclusion -- 「你說左冷禪下手將咱二人害了? 哼,咱們既已在武林立足,那又顧得了這許多? 前怕虎,後怕狼的,還能在江湖上混麼?」 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.70.164.90
文章代碼(AID): #16uNP9ZT (BaseballSYS)
文章代碼(AID): #16uNP9ZT (BaseballSYS)