Re: [情報] Nooooooooote

看板MLB (美國職棒/大聯盟)作者時間15年前 (2010/11/09 16:35), 編輯推噓10(1008)
留言18則, 11人參與, 最新討論串3/8 (看更多)
※ 引述《externaload (Vision of disorder)》之銘言: : 今日11/09 : 條子: Lee的agents表示,不會這麼快跟其中一隊成交 這篇文章也說到部份的原因 :http://goo.gl/x0iSm Why Most Type A Free Agents Won't Sign Right Away By Ben Nicholson-Smith [November 8, 2010 at 3:53pm CST] Free agents can now negotiate with any team, but it would be a surprise to see more than a few Type As sign in the next two weeks. Clubs forfeit a top draft pick if they sign Type A free agents before the deadline for teams to offer arbitration to departing free agents. That means teams are probably going to wait until after November 23rd to sign Type A free agents who aren't guaranteed offers of arbitration. If the player's former team doesn't offer arbitration he won't cost anything despite his Type A ranking, so the signing team gets to keep its draft pick. Some Type A free agents - Carl Crawford and Cliff Lee, for example - are definitely getting offers of arbitration from their former clubs. But the group of Type As below won't necessarily see offers of arbitration, so it seems likely that teams will wait until after the 23rd to finalize deals. Their patience could allow them to hold onto picks in the 2011 draft. Grant Balfour, Frank Francisco, Jason Frasor, Vladimir Guerrero, Matt Guerrier, Ramon Hernandez, Paul Konerko, Derrek Lee, Bengie Molina, Magglio Ordonez, Carl Pavano, A.J. Pierzynski, Manny Ramirez, Arthur Rhodes, Takashi Saito, Miguel Tejada and Dan Wheeler could certainly re-sign with their former clubs in the next two weeks, but it seems unlikely that they'll reach deals with new teams before November 23rd. : 天使: 天使今年季後也許會被Bora$狠噱一筆 : 他們今年有興趣的幾尾大魚都是Boras的客戶 : 包括了吹哥和Soriano,以及Jayson Werth (如果追不到尻佛 : 的替代人選) Scott Boras Clients (Updated 11-8-10): http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/10/scott-boras-cli.html : 費城: 將小幅調漲明年季賽票價 : 紅襪: 已經開始跟Jayson Werth的agents接觸了(Bora$$$$$) : 國民: 據傳聞指出國民很早就端出三年的offer給蛋哥了 : 但是他想要四年以上長約故遲遲未跟球團達成協議 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.137.91.88

11/09 17:31, , 1F
也就是太早簽下A級妖怪會喪失選秀權,是嗎?
11/09 17:31, 1F

11/09 17:34, , 2F
Boras的客戶真是嘆為奇觀
11/09 17:34, 2F

11/09 17:46, , 3F
太早簽下typeA 母隊當然會提arb讓你掉選秀權啊
11/09 17:46, 3F

11/09 17:46, , 4F
所以要等到母隊確定給不給arb之後再來談新約
11/09 17:46, 4F

11/09 17:51, , 5F
MLB的制度真的會令人眼花繚亂
11/09 17:51, 5F

11/09 18:03, , 6F
11/23前簽 母隊一定提arb 拿新簽約球隊選秀權
11/09 18:03, 6F

11/09 18:04, , 7F
11/23後簽 有可能碰到母隊沒給arb 就不用丟選秀權了 ?!
11/09 18:04, 7F

11/09 18:13, , 8F
對啊
11/09 18:13, 8F

11/09 18:25, , 9F
那是部分A級球員而已 對Lee沒差 遊騎兵肯定會提arb
11/09 18:25, 9F

11/09 19:03, , 10F
arb是指薪資仲裁嗎??
11/09 19:03, 10F

11/09 19:11, , 11F
樓上 是的
11/09 19:11, 11F

11/09 19:20, , 12F
對Lee來說 TEX肯定提arb,Lee也肯定拒絕
11/09 19:20, 12F

11/09 19:22, , 13F
母隊要不提arb是幾乎不可能的吧?選秀權能撈就撈
11/09 19:22, 13F

11/09 19:42, , 14F
不一定啊 有時候球團不想提arb是怕球員會接受
11/09 19:42, 14F

11/09 19:44, , 15F
有時候提了結果球員接受就糗了 打亂球團的規畫
11/09 19:44, 15F

11/09 19:45, , 16F
XD 跟價錢有關,但小市場球隊大概較常提前做交易
11/09 19:45, 16F

11/09 19:46, , 17F
等到typeAorB的補償選秀,畢竟風險大很多
11/09 19:46, 17F

11/10 04:18, , 18F
老麥的例子嗎
11/10 04:18, 18F
文章代碼(AID): #1CsGU-ig (MLB)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 8 篇):
55
69
54
76
76
119
33
42
10
18
30
38
文章代碼(AID): #1CsGU-ig (MLB)