Re: Player option 的一個問題

看板NBAGM作者 (想吃tiramisu)時間20年前 (2004/06/09 08:29), 編輯推噓4(400)
留言4則, 4人參與, 最新討論串5/5 (看更多)
※ 引述《Lyotard (非人)》之銘言: : 回到 Nash 的問題。所以說,現在出現了一個狀況:無法判斷 Nash : 的 Option,是普通的 PO 呢?還是 ETO 呢?如果是 PO 的話,狀況 : 應該就如上面說的那樣。 而如果是 ETO 的話,球隊還是得趕快打電 : 話去找 Nash,說服他早點執行選擇權脫離合約。 沒記錯的話 5/27有一份報導 Nash已經正式宣布opt out 他現在是UFA 如果照非人大之前給的網址看的話 an Early Termination Option (or "ETO") is exercisable only once and takes effect no earlier than the end of the fifth Season of the Contract. 然後又由於Nash的合約是99年1/25 延長的 A Contract that does not provide for an ETO when signed may not be amended to provide for an ETO during the original term of the Contract. A Team and a player may enter into an Extension that contains an ETO, provided that such ETO takes effect no earlier than the fifth Season following (i) the Season during which the Extension is signed, or (ii) if the Extension is signed between Seasons, the date on which the Extension is signed. 所以Nash的opt out應屬ETO 是這樣的嗎? 完蛋 我腦筋一片混亂@@ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.14.0.206

61.216.43.204 06/09, , 1F
you get it :)
61.216.43.204 06/09, 1F

218.14.0.206 06/09, , 2F
呼 好險 沒有疑惑了^^
218.14.0.206 06/09, 2F

220.139.72.101 06/09, , 3F
沒錯~~就是這樣
220.139.72.101 06/09, 3F

61.229.186.31 06/09, , 4F
樓上的怎麼不早出來澄清一下就成了
61.229.186.31 06/09, 4F
文章代碼(AID): #10nbdJCN (NBAGM)
文章代碼(AID): #10nbdJCN (NBAGM)