Re: [討論] 今年的合約跟交易
OK, "nothing" is not appropriate
But if I were the GM, I would not pull the trigger if Santana did not sigh
during the trade.
How about you?
Renting Santana for one year is not worth four top prospects IMO.
The idea of a long term deal must be proposed by Mets firstly, of course with
less years and money. Even Santana had NTC, he can still just waive it and
go to Mets without signing a long term deal but entering the FA market later.
But Mets just did not allow that to happen. The trade and the long term deal
are in a bundle. The leverage was on Santana's side.
※ 引述《goopa (除此之外)》之銘言：
: ※ 引述《kafen (石頭)》之銘言：
: 交易哪有穩搶不陪的道理，交易的重點在於，你付出的代價你是否能夠承受，你拿到的東
: 西是否是你想要的。如果交易發生了風險你能否承受，還有你是否就是那個可以拍板定案
: 的人。
: 從這個Case來說，如果Santana沒有NTC，則大都會可以在交易他之後直到他成為FA之前
: 大約12個月的時間跟他談合約，這是額外的優勢，而即使他們最後沒能延長合約，他們
: 依然換到了一個賽揚獎投手整整一年的服務。 你所謂nothing意思就是一個賽揚獎投手
: 整整一年的服務是無價的(無可估價? 不值一文?)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 209.173.238.18
※ 編輯: kafen 來自: 209.173.238.18 (07/05 17:06)
討論串 (同標題文章)
NY-Yankees 近期熱門文章
215
426
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
61
159