[DT]Film Study: Finding what works within t …

看板Thunder (奧克拉荷馬市雷霆)作者poning (Oh Yeah!!!)時間16年前 (2010/02/02 17:03)推噓5(5推 0噓 0→)

留言5則, 5人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

（續上篇）原文連結：http://tinyurl.com/yzdw2b4 Play 3: Second quarter 5:24: http://tinyurl.com/ygs48h7 Durant misses the shot here, but this is a crisp set and KD knocks this one down with regularity. Russell Westbrook comes and gets the ball from Serge Ibaka at the top of the key. But here’s where you appreciate Durant moving without the ball. Watch his perfect hesitation on the baseline under the rim. It sets up his man beautifully for the double-screen from Nenad Krstic (who sets a very nice pick) and Serge Ibaka. KD這個外線沒投進，但這是一次乾淨俐落的進攻，KD這球只要彈道修正一點，投進的機會就很高。Russ移動到弧頂附近去接應Ibaka，(譯註：請看影片)KD這次的無球跑位很不錯，注意他在底線時的腳步，非常棒。這次Krstic與Ibaka的雙檔也很出色(尤其 Krstic擋的非常紮實)。 So much of OKC’s offense is reliant on quality screens. And Krstic sets a good one here. But if the screen is poor or it’s set up poorly, the set fail. Durant is excellent at setting his defender up for a pick. Joey Graham really never sees it coming because he’s trying to trail KD. There’s really nothing wrong with this execution other than the fact Durant missed the shot. The screens were good, the ball was delivered on time and in a good spot from Westbrook and the look was open. Just missed it. 雷霆大部份的進攻品質好壞，在於掩護的出色與否。這次Krstic擋人很確實，如果他沒有做好這一環的話，這個play就不會成功。KD也很會利用掩護。Joey Graham一心只想釘住 KD，完全沒發現會被Krstic擋住。這個play沒什麼好挑的，除了KD沒投進以外。擋人很確實，傳球時機也抓到了，Russ是這個play打出來的另一個因素，他看到KD出現空檔。可惜沒投進。 Play 4: Second quarter, 1:52: http://tinyurl.com/ykwv8qr This is one of my favorite possessions of the night. The initial play is shut down, but Westbrook does an excellent job of resetting a play with Krstic and then making a good decision. The ball is supposed to go to Durant off a screen initially, but Krstic’s screen catches all air. So Westbrook backs out and goes to his next option. 這是這場比賽我最欣賞的play之一。最初的戰術雖然失敗，但Russ把進攻重新組織了起來，作的非常好，他跟Krstic的配合很棒，Krstic也做出正確的決定。這個play一開始應該是Krstic幫KD作一個單檔，但Krstic什麼也沒擋到，所以Russ稍微退後一點，重新組織一個新的進攻。 He calls for the high pick-and-pop with Krstic. It’s executed nicely, as Nenad has a nice look from about 20-feet. But Krstic makes a great choice as he sees Jeff Green’s man, Kenyon Martin come to guard him. Krstic could have launched here, but he makes the right decision and swings the ball to Green. Everything is in perfect rhythm. In all honesty, Green could have swung the ball once more to Durant in the corner, who is the higher percentage 3-point shooter. But Green launches and hits. 他要Krstic上前到高位幫他作擋拆，這次作的不錯，讓Krstic在20呎左右的距離有著不錯的空檔。但Krstic沒有出手，他做了正確的決定。他看到本來守Green的Martin現在過來守他了。他大可趁早出手，但他決定把球傳給三分線外大空檔的Green。每個環節都很完美。其實Green他可以再把球傳給底線的KD，他三分線命中率很高，不過Green決定自己來，他投進了。 I like this play because after the original set is shut off, Westbrook calls for his bread and butter play. And through that second option, a good look comes out of it. So much of good offense is making a defense rotate and help-defend, and after that happens, hitting the open shot. The ball found its way to a good shooter with an open look. That’s quality offense. 我欣賞這個play，因為Russ可以在第一個進攻計畫失敗之後，立刻反應過來。雖然這只是第二選擇，但他組織的很好。良好的進攻戰術可以造成對手需要輪轉防守與換防，這兩種情形一出現，出現空檔的機會就變大。這次雷霆把握住空檔了。這個進攻play的品質很好。 Play 5: Second quarter, 6:08: http://tinyurl.com/y96pwsc This last one is a great example of an athletic player making a play. This wasn’t a good offensive possession. Durant’s drive is shut off, he picks up his dribble with nowhere to go, but through it, the Thunder scores two points. So many times, that’s all it takes. When a guy just makes an aggressive, athletic play and scores two points, it’s good offense. But what makes it work is how decisive Ibaka is. If he catches the ball and hesitates or looks to pass, Andersen recovers and Ibaka’s lane to drive isn’t there. But he receives the pass and goes right away and has an open path to the bucket. 最後一個play是一個很好的例子，告訴我們有運動力的球員該怎麼進攻。這個play並沒打出來，KD不能切入，他已經收球了，但一點空檔都沒有。雖然如此，雷霆還是打進了一球。有時我們就是必須這樣子打。靠著侵略性的打法與運動能力進攻，並且拿下兩分的這種打法也是一種好play。看看Ibaka怎麼打的，看看Ibaka毫不猶疑的態度，如果他接到球稍微遲疑了，還在找人傳球的話，鳥王馬上就會回到他的位置上，Ibaka也沒辦法切入了，但Ibaka沒有遲疑，接球以後立刻切進去，並且輕鬆上籃得分。 Oklahoma City can be a very good offensive team. In transition, the Thunder’ s very good. It’s just that the offensive sets sometimes rely on a good screen and if that whiffs, then all goes to heck and things have to start over with the shot clock on their back. But that’s where a good point guard resets the offense, calls for a new play and makes it happen, much like Russ did with the fourth play I showed. 雷霆可以成為一隻進攻出色的球隊。他們只需要讓他們的掩護可以適時發揮，亦或即使第一選項失敗了，他們能夠利用剩餘的時間重新組織好，如果他們能夠做得到，雷霆將是一隻很棒的球隊。一個好的控衛能夠重新組織進攻，重打另一個play並讓play執行順利，就像Russ曾經作到的，而且我希望在第四節他也能作到。 The Thunder has a bunch of offensive weapons. Too much dribbling and indecisiveness can kill a possession (as shown in the first play). It’s just about attacking with open lanes to hoop, finding open creases for a good look and most importantly, making the open shot. 其實雷霆有很多進攻武器，太多的運球跟猶豫只會斷送進攻的機會，就像play 1一樣。我們只要能夠拉開空間，有良好的視野可以適時找到空檔，還有最重要的把握空檔出手就可以了。 Or… just have Kevin Durant make everything he takes like he did last night against Golden State. Either way. 或者，讓KD每天跟對勇士隊那場比賽一樣神也是可以的啦！ -- 哲學的義務，是去除因誤解而生的幻想。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 211.22.7.197 ※ 編輯: poning 來自: 211.22.7.197 (02/02 17:06)