Re: [ 問 ] Santana

看板MIN-Twins作者 (No Day but Today)時間19年前 (2006/02/14 14:27), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串6/7 (看更多)
※ 引述《sandieco (聖地)》之銘言: : 經過明察暗訪之後, 終於找到了呼之欲出的答案了: : http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/12131999.htm : Dec. 13, 1999 : Minnesota Twins traded Jared Camp and cash to Florida Marlins : in exchange for Johan Santana. : 原來並不是單純定孤支的交易 : Twins 另外還付了一筆錢給 Marlins : 因此如果說密謀是各選各想要的人選, 那 Marlins 就拿不到這筆錢 : 甚至連口袋人選 Jared Camp 都有被 Twins 攔胡的危險 : 這樣就人財兩失了 : 所以事先跟 Twins 與虎謀皮一下, 互相攔胡再互換, : 確實對 Marlins 來說是最合理的作法 : 這樣我的疑問也就迎刃而解了... It makes sense for the Marlins, but not at all for the Twins. Why would the Twins give up money and the No.1 pick for the No.2 pick? I've done some web search and some said it was the Marlins that paid to the Twins. Anyway, the amount of cash involved in the deal was insignificant. Let's not waste time arguing over the "moo point", as Joey Tribiani would say. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.70.7.70 ※ 編輯: tradewind 來自: 203.70.7.70 (02/14 17:15)
文章代碼(AID): #13yNXIS0 (MIN-Twins)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
3
3
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 7 篇):
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
文章代碼(AID): #13yNXIS0 (MIN-Twins)